MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2605135192 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2017-0015

Origin of singularity in Big Bang theory from zero point energy

2017· article· en· W2605135192 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Tapan Kumar Das

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Canadian institutionsProfessional Engineers Ontario
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsPhysicsZero-point energyCasimir effectUniverseSingularityBig Bang (financial markets)Ultimate fate of the universeInitial singularityTheoretical physicsDark energyPlanck lengthZero-energy universePlanckObservable universeBig RipObservableClassical mechanicsCosmologyQuantum mechanicsMetric expansion of spaceDe Sitter universePhysical cosmologyQuantum gravity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a mathematical proposition based on zero point energy of the creation of singularity in the current Hot Bing Bang theory of the origin of the universe. The observable universe we live in and can see is finite and is defined by the speed of light. The entire universe is infinite and the observable universe is part of it. Zero point energy exists in the entire universe and at all frequencies up to the Planck frequency. Zero point energy was calculated by Planck. The Casimir effect, predicted by Hendrick Casimir, is caused by zero point energy and has been experimentally proven by S. Lamoreux and U. Mohideen. The author has mathematically calculated that the zero point energy waves up to Planck frequency can combine to create an energy source of colossal amount similar to the singularity of Hot Big Bang theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir EffectFrench-language works237,207