Refolding the unfoldable: A systematic approach for renaturation of<i>Bacillus circulans</i>xylanase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Xylanases are important polysaccharide-cleaving catalysts for the pulp and paper, animal feeds and biofuels industries. They have also proved to be valuable model systems for understanding enzymatic catalysis, with one of the best studied being the GH11 xylanase from Bacillus circulans (Bcx). However, proteins from this class are very recalcitrant to refolding in vitro. This both limits their high level expression in heterologous hosts, and prevents experimental approaches, such as peptide ligation or chemical modifications, to probe and engineer their stability and function. To solve this problem, a systematic screening approach was employed to identify suitable buffer conditions for renaturing Bcx in vitro. The fractional factorial screen employed identified starting conditions for refolding, which were then refined and developed into a generic protocol for renaturing preparative amounts of active Bcx in a 50-60% yield from inclusion bodies. The method is robust and proved equally proficient at refolding circularly permuted versions that carry cysteine mutations. This general approach should be applicable to related GH11 xylanases, as well as proteins adopting a similar β-jellyroll fold, that are otherwise recalcitrant to refolding in vitro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".