MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2611406581 · doi:10.1109/jmems.2017.2675987

Practical CMUT Fabrication With a Nitride-to-Oxide-Based Wafer Bonding Process

2017· article· en· W2611406581 on OpenAlexafffund
Albert I. H. Chen, Lawrence L. P. Wong, Zhenhao Li, Shuai Na, John T. W. Yeow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microelectromechanical Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of WaterlooUniversité de SherbrookeCMC Microsystems
KeywordsCapacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducersMaterials scienceWafer bondingWaferFabricationSilicon on insulatorOptoelectronicsLOCOSSurface micromachiningMicroelectromechanical systemsSilicon nitrideElectronic engineeringSiliconPiezoelectricityComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The introduction of wafer-bonding technique to capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) fabrication offered advantages over the surface micromachining technique, such as simplified fabrication, better membrane uniformity, and increased active area. The conventional wafer-bonding CMUT process employs silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers to produce the vibrating membrane layer. However, the use of SOI wafers can lead to poor membrane thickness uniformity despite the high cost. Furthermore, an additional local-oxidation (LOCOS) process should be used for SOI-based wafer bonding process to improve breakdown voltage and reduce parasitic capacitance. This paper reports a nitride-to-oxide bonding process for CMUT fabrication, designed to achieve similar results as the LOCOS-added process reported by Park et al., but without the need for SOIs and fabrication complexity. A fully functional CMUT designed for collapse-mode operation was fabricated and an immersion center frequency was measured to be 4.2 MHz with a 90% bandwidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Microelectromechanical SystemsSame topic3D IC and TSV technologiesFrench-language works237,207