MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract NTOC-093: SYNTHETIC LETHAL APPROACHES TO TARGET ARID1A DEFICIENT OVARIAN CANCERS

2017· article· en· W2621474688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saira Khalique, Chris T. Williamson, Helen N. Pemberton, Patty T. Wai, Malini Menon, Rachel Brough, A Leonidou, Barrie Peck, Susana Banerjee, Rachael Natrajan, Christopher J. Lord

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsARID1ASynthetic lethalityCancer researchOvarian cancerClear cell carcinomaClear cellSerous fluidBiologyCancerEndometrial cancerOvarian carcinomaMedicineDNA repairCarcinomaMutationInternal medicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the Western world. Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC), a distinct histological subtype, has a notably poor prognosis in the advanced setting compared to patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Understanding why these patients have a poor outcome may be due to the underlying genetic drivers and their response to treatment. Dysregulation of the SWI/SNF complex is one of the most commonly occurring defects in solid cancers. Mutations in ARID1A (AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A), a gene that encodes for BAF250A, forming part of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, rarely occur in HGSOC but are common in ovarian clear cell carcinomas. The vast majority of these are loss of function frameshift or nonsense mutations, resulting in loss of protein function. In addition, loss of ARID1A expression in tumour specimens has been associated with a shorter progression free survival and chemoresistance in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC). Despite the understanding that ARID1A defects are associated with tumourigenesis, targeted therapy approaches that exploit this deficiency have not as yet been developed. Our aims were to identify ways of targeting ARID1A deficient tumours by performing a large-scale functional genomics screen to identify actionable synthetic lethal effects. Using a high-throughput combination drug screen with a plate library of 80 compounds and a phase 1 compound, in isogenic ARID1A null and wild type HCT116 cells, we have identified candidate therapeutic approaches to targeting ARID1A mutant tumours that could be assessed in proof of concept clinical trials. We have undertaken subsequent high throughput drug screens in isogenic ARID1A null and wild type MCF10A cells that in we have identified a series of novel synthetic lethal effects. Assessment of this combinatorial approach in in vivo models of ARID1A mutant cancers is now underway. In conclusion, we have identified clinically actionable combinatorial approaches that may provide additional therapeutic benefit for ARID1A deficient patients. Citation Format: Saira Khalique, Chris T. Williamson, Helen Pemberton, Patty T. Wai, Malini Menon, Rachel Brough, Andri Leonidou, Barrie Peck, Susana Banerjee, Rachael C. Natrajan and Christopher J. Lord,. SYNTHETIC LETHAL APPROACHES TO TARGET ARID1A DEFICIENT OVARIAN CANCERS [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 12-13, 2016; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(11 Suppl):Abstract nr NTOC-093.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.476
GPT teacher head0.503
Teacher spread0.026 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207