MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preliminary results of a phase I/IIa study of BMS-986156 (glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor–related gene [GITR] agonist), alone and in combination with nivolumab in pts with advanced solid tumors.

2017· article· en· W2624341173 on OpenAlexaff
Lillian L. Siu, Neeltje Steeghs, Tarek Meniawy, Markus Joerger, Jennifer L. Spratlin, Sylvie Rottey, Adnan Nagrial, Adam Cooper, Roland Meier, Xiaowei Guan, Penny Phillips, Gaurav Bajaj, Jochem Gokemeijer, Alan J. Korman, Kyaw Aung, Matteo S. Carlino

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNivolumabPharmacologyPharmacodynamicsImmunogenicityAdverse effectInternal medicinePharmacokineticsCancerImmunotherapyImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

104 Background: BMS-986156 is a fully human IgG1 agonist mAb that binds GITR and promotes T effector cell activation and possible reduction/inactivation of T regulatory cells. Preclinical data show enhanced antitumor T-cell activity with anti-GITR + anti–programmed death-1 (PD-1). Here we describe preliminary dose escalation data from a phase I/IIa study of BMS-986156 ± nivolumab (anti–PD-1 mAb) in pts with advanced solid tumors (NCT02598960). Methods: During dose escalation, pts received BMS-986156 (10–800 mg) or BMS-986156 (30–800 mg) + nivolumab (240 mg) every 2 weeks. Objectives included safety (primary), immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy. Results: As of Dec 12, 2016, 66 pts were treated with BMS-986156 (n = 29) or BMS-986156 + nivolumab (n = 37).No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported during dose escalation. The most common treatment-related adverse events reported with BMS-986156/BMS-986156 + nivolumab included pyrexia (21%/30%), chills (10%/16%), and fatigue (14%/14%); events were G1/2 in all pts except for 4 pts (6%) treated with the combination (G3 lipase [n = 1], G3 lung infection [n = 1], G3 fatigue [n = 1], and G3 aspartate aminotransferase with G4 creatine phosphokinase [n = 1; leading to discontinuation of treatment]). Preliminary data indicate that the incidence of immunogenicity to BMS-986156 was low when BMS-986156 ± nivolumab was administered. Preliminary data also indicate that BMS-986156 ± nivolumab exhibits linear PK with dose proportionality after a single dose, and BMS-986156 ± nivolumab is biologically active in PD analyses in peripheral blood. Initial antitumor activity has been observed in several pts treated with the combination; these data will be reported. Conclusions: This is the first report of clinical data with an anti-GITR mAb ± a PD-1 inhibitor.BMS-986156 ± nivolumab was well tolerated, with no DLTs and low immunogenicity. Antitumor activity was observed with BMS-986156 + nivolumab at doses predicted to be biologically active. Further evaluation of this combination in pts with advanced solid tumors is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02598960.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207