MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Platelet Release from Infused CD34+-Derived Human Megakaryocytes: Lessons from a Natural-Occurring Platelet Bioreactor

2016· article· en· W2728845318 on OpenAlexaff
Ian Johnston, Vincent M. Hayes, Jing Dai, Danuta Jarocha, Paul Kubes, Mortimer Poncz, Lubica Rauova

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlateletThrombopoiesisMegakaryocyteIn vivoIn vitroCell biologyBone marrowBiologyPathologyChemistryImmunologyHaematopoiesisStem cellMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The release of biologically intact platelets from in vitro-grown megakaryocytes remains one of the challenges in an attempt to replace donor-derived platelets with platelets prepared from in vitro-grown megakaryocytes. Thrombopoiesis, the process by which megakaryocytes release platelets, is thought to occur as megakaryocytes exit from the medullar space and transit into the blood stream. Two-photon fluorescence microscopy studies by several groups have documented megakaryocytes transitioning into the blood stream and extending mostly a single protrusion that appears to release large cytoplasmic fragments downstream. These studies have been widely interpreted to support platelet release in the bone marrow environment. A counter proposal made by Dr. William Howell over 75 years ago is that either whole megakaryocytes or large cytoplasmic fragments circulate to the lungs and release platelets in the lungs. Studies by our group infusing in vitro-grown megakaryocytes (both human and mouse) have shown that infused megakaryocytes do indeed become entrapped in the lungs and release platelets. These in vivo-released platelets have a much longer half-life than in vitro-prepared platelets from static cultures and have the same size distribution and nearly the same functionality as infused donor-derived platelets. Using confocal intravital microscopy, we now directly visualized the lungs of recipient NOD-SCID interferon 2 receptor γ-deficient mice during the infusion of calcein-loaded CD34+-derived megakaryocytes. Infused human megakaryocytes were immediately arrested in the pulmonary bed in vessels ~50 µm in diameter. Each cell then extended several distinct protrusions winding down presumed pulmonary capillaries that are presumably wrapped around alveoli. Some of these protrusions reached 200-300 µm in length and assumed the appearance of beads on a string. Consistent with our recently published data, this thrombopoiesis process appears to take 30 minutes to be near-complete, similar to the timeframe we showed for detecting newly released human platelet-like particles after megakaryocyte infusion. At 30 minutes, remaining bodies of the megakaryocytes are still present and we presume these are mostly the remaining nuclei. To better define whether the pulmonary bed is unique for releasing platelets, we also infused megakaryocytes intra-arteriole rather than intravenously to have the megakaryocytes encounter other organ capillary beds before the lung. These studies showed poor platelet release compared to parallel studies in mice receiving the megakaryocytes intravenously. Many of the intra-arterial infused megakaryocytes were entrapped in the spleen and very few were notable in other organs, including the lungs, liver and kidney. Our studies showed that megakaryocytes can shed platelets in the lungs where they may take advantage of the unique three-dimensional organization of the pulmonary vascular bed, flow conditions, vascular surface receptors and glycocalyx as well as a sudden shift from hypoxic to normoxic conditions. Whether these features of the pulmonary vascular bed can be simulated ex vivo and whether this will enhance true platelet release from megakaryocytes in vitro needs to be examined. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→