Abstract 5: Analysis of Workflow Aad Determinants of Delays in the Escape Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The ESCAPE trial used innovative imaging and aggressive target time metrics to demonstrate the benefit of additional endovascular treatment over standard care in patients with disabling acute ischemic stroke. We performed a detailed analysis of workflow and determine modifiable factors resulting in delays. Methods: The trial enrolled 316 patients fulfilling eligibility criteria and presenting within 12 hours of stroke symptom onset from 22 sites across 3 continents between February 2013 and October 2014. We considered four specific interval times: onset-to-ED arrival, ED-arrival-to-qualifying CT scan, qualifying CT scan-to-groin puncture, groin puncture-to-reperfusion. Missing times were not imputed. When reperfusion was not achieved, the reperfusion time was considered missing and was not imputed. Interval times from stroke symptom onset to first reperfusion are reported using medians and inter-quartile range. To assess the relationship between patient, hospital and health system characteristics as predictors of longer interval times, a negative binomial regression provided the best fit to the data. Results: Stroke symptom onset to arrival in emergency room of endovascular capable hospital time was 42% (34 mins) longer among patients who received intravenous alteplase at the referring hospital (drip and ship) vs. patients directly transferred to the endovascular capable hospital (direct to mother ship) (Figure). Qualifying CT to groin puncture time was 15% (8 mins) shorter among patients presenting during work hours vs. off hours. Time from qualifying CT to groin puncture was 41% (24 min) shorter in drip and ship patients than vs. when intravenous alteplase was administered after qualifying CT (mothership). General anesthesia prolonged this time by 43% (22 min). Balloon guide catheter during endovascular procedure shortened time from groin puncture to reperfusion by 21% (8 mins). Conclusions: Inefficiencies in triaging systems, presentation during off hours, intravenous alteplase administration, GA utilization and endovascular techniques offer major opportunities for improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.042 | 0.072 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".