MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738049143 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-087-x:341

Measurement of Intracellular Free Calcium Ion Concentration in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells: Fluorescence Imaging of Cytosolic Calcium

2003· article· en· W2738049143 on OpenAlexaff
Rhian M. Touyz, Ernesto L. Schiffrin

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsMontreal Clinical Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecond messenger systemVascular smooth musclePhosphatidylinositolIntracellularInositol trisphosphateCell biologyPhospholipase CInositolEndoplasmic reticulumDiacylglycerol kinaseCytosolCalciumCalcium in biologyRyanodine receptorChemistryBiologyReceptorSignal transductionEndocrinologyBiochemistryProtein kinase CSmooth muscle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Changes in intracellular free calcium ion concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) play a major role in vascular smooth muscle cell function (1,2). Elevation of [Ca(2+)](i) is an important regulator of multiple downstream signaling pathways and it is a major determinant of vascular smooth muscle contraction (1-3). Agonists, such as angiotensin II (Ang II), endothelin-1, and vasopressin, that mediate effects through G protein-coupled receptors, increase [Ca(2+)](i) by inducing Ca(2+)mobilization from intracellular sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticular stores, and by stimulating transplasmalemmal Ca(2+)influx (4-6). One of the earliest measurable events resulting from Ang II stimulation of vascular smooth muscle cells, is a rapid, phospholipase C (PLC)-mediated hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, to produce two second messengers, 1,2 diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3)) (7,8). The water-soluble messenger IP(3), binds to specific IP(3) receptors to release Ca(2+)from nonmitochondrial intracellular stores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207