MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Selinexor in Advanced Liposarcoma (SEAL) study: A phase 2/3, multicenter, randomized, double blind study of selinexor versus placebo in patients with advanced, unresectable, dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS).

2016· article· en· W2739400913 on OpenAlexaff
Mrinal M. Gounder, Andrew J. Wagner, Neeta Somaiah, Richard F. Riedel, Gary K. Schwartz, Steven Attia, Albiruni R. Abdul Razak, Lee D. Cranmer, Scott H. Okuno, Mohammed Milhem, Cassandra Choe-Juliak, Sharon Shacham, Michael Kauffman, Sant P. Chawla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical endpointPlaceboInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchOncologyGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialChemotherapyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TPS11072 Background: DDLS represents progression from low- to high-grade non-lipogenic morphology within well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLS) with the potential to metastasize and a higher mortality rate. Selinexor is an oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export that specifically blocks XPO1, leading to the nuclear accumulation and re-activation of tumor suppressor proteins and growth modulators. Selinexor demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity in liposarcoma (LPS) cell line and murine models. Sarcoma patients received selinexor in two Phase 1 studies, resulting in stable disease in 14/18 (78%) of patients with advanced LPS; notably, 6 of these had stable disease ≥ 4 months. Tumor reduction of 2-23% was noted in 14 patients. There were no clinically significant cumulative toxicities. Hence, we designed a Phase 2/3 multi-center, randomized, double blind study to assess whether selinexor can improve progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with advanced unresectable DDLS compared to placebo. Methods: Eligible patients have DDLS with measurable disease, radiologic evidence of progressive disease (PD) within 6 months, and have had at least one prior line of systemic therapy. Patients with pure WDLS, myxoid/round cell or pleomorphic subtypes are not eligible. Patients will be randomized 1:1 (selinexor:placebo) during Phase 2, and 2:1 during Phase 3 and will receive selinexor 60 mg or placebo twice weekly on a 42 day cycle until PD or intolerability. Patients with PD on placebo can crossover to selinexor. The primary endpoint is PFS. The study is powered to detect a 50% improvement with selinexor versus placebo. Secondary endpoints include overall survival and response rate. Planned total sample size (Phase 2+3) is 245. Enrollment began in January 2016. Clinical trial information: NCT02606461.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→