MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741655923 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-319

Abstract 319: Cholesterol inhibition reduces Hh mediated chondrosarcoma

2017· article· en· W2741655923 on OpenAlexaff
Qingxia Wei, Eyal Ramu, Mushriq Al‐Jazrawe, Raymond Poon, Jay S. Wunder, Benjamin A. Alman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLovastatinIn vivoCholesterolSimvastatinHMG-CoA reductasePharmacologyHigh cholesterolEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyChemistryMedicineReductaseBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Constitutive activation of Hh signaling is a common occurrence in chondrosarcoma(CSA). Gene profiling analysis showed that Gli transcription regulates genes that govern cholesterol homeostasis, which alters cholesterol accumulation in chondrocytes; a higher level of Gli-mediated transcription results in accumulation of intracellular cholesterol. Here we determined if targeting cholesterol-processing genes downstream of Hh signalling could be used as a novel treatment approach. With institutional review board approval, human CSA samples were obtained fresh from surgery. For in vitro studies, CSA explants of 2mmx2mm x2 mm cubic in size establihed as organ cultures. For in vivo studies, one million CSA cells were subcutanously injected into NSG mice. Cells from five CSAs were treated both in vitro and in vivo with a hedgehog inhibitor, Cur61414, a cholesterol inhibitor, Lovastatin, or both. In vitro, CSA explants were treated for 48 hrs at concentration of 20 μM of each drug. In vivo, mice were treated with 4.5mg/kg/day of Cur61414, Lovastatin, or both by intraperitoneal injection for 4 wks. At the end of treatment, the explants or xenografts were harvested and processed for further analysis. RT-PCR was used to meausre the expression of Hh and cholesterol target genes. Tumor size was meausred from the xenografts. Blockade of Hh signaling significantly decreased Gli1 gene expression by 30%, increased 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) expression for more than 300% indicating decreased intracellular cholesterol. Treatment with the cholesterol inhibitor Lovastatin increased expression of HMGCR for more than 500%. The combination of Hh and cholesterol blockage resulted in increased expression of HMGCR for more than 3400%. Analysis of chondrosarcoma xenografts in vivo showed a significnat decrease in tumor size with Lovastatin (32% decline), 3 folds reducation of Brdu(+) cells, and 2.4 fold increase of Caspase-3 + cells, treatment with Cur 61414 reduced the tumor growth by 5% with no significant reduction of Brdu(+) cells but 2.6 fold increase of Caspase-3 (+) cells . The combination treatment of lovastatin and Cur61414 on xenografts resulted in a significnat decrease in tumor size (32% decline), 3 fold reduction of Brdu (+) cells, but no significant changes of Caspase-3 (+) cells . These data suggest that cholesterol functions downstream of Hh signaling pathway in CSA. The more effective reduction in tumor growth with cholesterol inhibition compared to Hh blockade suggests cholesterol blockade is an effective therapeutic approach. Citation Format: Qingxia Wei, Eyal Ramu, Mushriq AL-Jazrawe, Raymond Poon, Jay Wunder, Benjamin Alman. Cholesterol inhibition reduces Hh mediated chondrosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 319. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-319

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207