MétaCan
← all works

The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles

2018· book-chapter· en· 1,218 citations· W2741809807 on OpenAlex· 10.7717/peerj.4375

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Classifier prediction

metacan-v1-d91a1de5be90

Predictions imitate two machine teachers. Scores are not calibrated prevalence probabilities.

Classifier candidate
MetaresearchBibliometricsScholarly communicationOpen scienceObservationalSimulation or modellingTheoretical or conceptual
Classifier consensus
MetaresearchBibliometricsScholarly communicationOpen scienceObservationalSimulation or modellingTheoretical or conceptual
Teacher imitation scores

Codex

Bibliometrics0.999
Open science0.996
Scholarly communication0.993
Metaresearch0.540
Observational0.527
Other design0.335
Theoretical or conceptual0.117
Simulation or modelling0.047
Research integrity0.005
Not applicable0.002
Science and technology studies0.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.000
Bench or experimental0.000
Systematic review0.000
Qualitative0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Meta-analysis0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Randomized trial0.000
Case report0.000

Gemma

Bibliometrics1.000
Open science0.992
Observational0.965
Metaresearch0.946
Theoretical or conceptual0.372
Scholarly communication0.121
Simulation or modelling0.025
Qualitative0.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.001
Bench or experimental0.001
Research integrity0.001
Meta-analysis0.000
Not applicable0.000
Science and technology studies0.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.000
Non-randomized trial0.000
Systematic review0.000
Case report0.000
Randomized trial0.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.528
GPT teacher head0.602
Teacher spread
0.074 how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

Despite growing interest in Open Access (OA) to scholarly literature, there is an unmet need for large-scale, up-to-date, and reproducible studies assessing the prevalence and characteristics of OA. We address this need using oaDOI, an open online service that determines OA status for 67 million articles. We use three samples, each of 100,000 articles, to investigate OA in three populations: (1) all journal articles assigned a Crossref DOI, (2) recent journal articles indexed in Web of Science,…

Retrieved from PubMed through NCBI EFetch. Structured section labels are preserved.