MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase 1 first-in-human (FIH) study of nesvacumab (REGN910) a fully human and selective angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) monoclonal antibody (MAb): Results from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cohort.

2014· article· en· W2743569343 on OpenAlexaff
Robin Kate Kelley, Lillian L. Siu, Katherine Van Loon, Anthony W. Tolcher, Albiruni R. Abdul Razak, Sharvina Ziyeh, Muralidhar Beeram, Philippe L. Bédard, Rebecca R. Arcos, Bo Gao, Pamela A. Trail, Lieve Adriaens, Carrie Brownstein, Israel Lowy, Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNauseaHepatocellular carcinomaAdverse effectVomitingInternal medicineSorafenibGastroenterologyAngiopoietin receptorOncologyAngiogenesis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2540 Background: Nesvacumab (N) is an Ang2 selective, human MAb that potently blocks signaling through the Tie2 receptor, inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and growth. In mouse xenograft models of human solid tumors, N inhibits tumor growth. In the dose-escalation (DE) portion of this trial [JCO 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2517)] anti-tumor activity (significant decline AFP) was observed in a patient (pt) with HCC, prompting expansion in this indication. Methods: Safety and anti-tumor activity are reported from all pts with HCC treated in the FIH trial in DE and expansion phases combined. In DE, single agent N was administered IV Q2W at 1 of 5 dose levels starting at 1 mg/kg; HCC expansion at 2 doses, 12, and 20 mg/kg Q2W, were studied. Results: 15 pts with HCC were enrolled: [11M/4F; median age 69 (range 24-82); ECOG PS 0=6/1=9; prior sorafenib 60%]. Dose levels were: 1 (n=1), 12 (n=6) and 20 mg/kg (n=8). Median number of doses administered was 8 (range 1-23). No pts experienced protocol defined DLTs. Most common adverse events (AEs) (all/related) were fatigue (8/5), diarrhea (5/0), decreased appetite (4/2), dizziness (4/0), nausea (4/2), abdominal pain (3/1), vomiting (3/1), back pain (3/0) and dyspnea (3/0); 9 grade ≥3 events reported in 7 pts, of which 3 events were assessed as treatment related: abdominal pain, infusion-related reaction, and retinal detachment, each reported in a single pt. One pt treated with 20 mg/kg experienced a non-severe lower GI bleed, assessed as not treatment related. No objective responses were observed. Two pts experienced a ≥ 50% decline in AFP (1 pt >90%). Nine of 15 pts achieved best response of SD (median duration 24 wks); 6 pts achieved SD for ≥ 20 wks. Notably, 5 of 8 pts treated at 20 mg/kg achieved best response of SD; median duration of 40 wks. Conclusions: Single-agent N up to 20mg/kg Q2W was generally tolerated in pts with HCC, with primarily mild and moderate AEs, independent of dose. SD occurred in 60% of pts across doses, with prolonged SD at highest dose. The safety profile supports combination with chemotherapy and/or other anti-angiogenic agents. Expansion in pts with HCC receiving N in addition to sorafenib is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01271972.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207