MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750250735 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00985

Reactivation of Intestinal Inflammation Is Suppressed by Catestatin in a Murine Model of Colitis via M1 Macrophages and Not the Gut Microbiota

2017· article· en· W2750250735 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, Nour Eissa, Peris M. Munyaka, Laëtitia Kermarrec, Omar Elgazzar, Ehsan Khafipour, Çharles N. Bernstein, Jean‐Eric Ghia

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCrohn's and Colitis CanadaMitacsResearch ManitobaHealth Sciences Centre Foundation
KeywordsColitisInflammatory bowel diseaseLipopolysaccharideInflammationMacrophageImmunologyTumor necrosis factor alphaGut floraCytokineInterleukinProinflammatory cytokineInterleukin 10MedicineIn vitroInternal medicineBiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While there is growing awareness of a relationship between chromogranin-A (CHGA) and susceptibility to inflammatory conditions, the role of human catestatin (hCTS; CHGA352-67) in the natural history of established inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not known. Recently, using two different experimental models, we demonstrated that hCTS-treated mice develop less severe acute colitis. We have also shown the implication of the macrophages in this effect. The aims of this study were to determine (1) whether hCTS treatment could attenuate the reactivation of inflammation in adult mice with previously established chronic colitis; (2) whether this effect is mediated through macrophages or the gut microbiota. Quiescent colitis was induced in 7–8-week-old C57BL6 mice using four cycles (2%–4%) of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). hCTS (1.5 mg/kg/day) treatment or vehicle started two days before the last induction of colitis and continuing for seven days. At sacrifice, macro- and microscopic scores were determined. Colonic pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-), classically activated (M1) (iNOS, Mcp1), alternatively activated (M2) (Ym1, Arg1) macrophages markers, were studied using ELISA and/or RT-qPCR. In vitro, peritoneal macrophages isolated from naïve mice and treated with hCTS (10-5 M, 12 h) were exposed to either lipopolysaccharide (LPS,100 ng/ml, 12 h) to polarize M1 macrophages or to IL-4/IL-13 (20 ng/ml) to polarize M2 macrophages. M1/M2 macrophage markers along with cytokine gene expression were determined using RT-qPCR. Feces and mucosa-associated microbiota (MAM) samples were collected, and the V4 region of 16s rRNA was sequenced. Micro- and macroscopic scores, colonic IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-), and M1 macrophages markers were significantly decreased in the hCTS treated group. Treatment did not have any effect colonic IL-10, TGF-, M2 markers nor modified the bacterial richness, diversity or the major phyla in colitic fecal and MAM samples. In vitro, pro-inflammatory cytokines levels, as well as their gene expression, were significantly reduced in hCTS-treated M1 macrophages. hCTS treatment did not affect M2 macrophage markers. These findings suggest that hCTS treatment attenuates the severity of inflammatory relapse through the modulation of the M1 macrophages and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell WallsFrench-language works237,207