MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751303173 · doi:10.1111/imj.67_13578

P67: LONG‐TERM MANAGEMENT OF MODERATE‐TO‐SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS WITH DUPILUMAB AND CONCOMITANT TOPICAL CORTICOSTEROIDS: A 1‐YEAR RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO‐CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL (CHRONOS)

2017· article· en· W2751303173 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Blauvelt, Melinda Gooderham, Peter Foley, Griffiths Cem, JC Cather, M. de Bruin-Weller, Xiaoping Zhu, Bolanle Akinlade, Graham NMH, Gianluca Pirozzi, Brad Shumel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternal Medicine Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEczema Area and Severity IndexAtopic dermatitisDupilumabPlaceboConcomitantRegimenInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialPlacebo-controlled studyClinical endpointAdverse effectDermatologyDouble blindPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-4-receptor-alpha monoclonal antibody, plus concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) were evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). CHRONOS (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02260986) was a 1-year, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study in adults with moderate-to-severe AD and an inadequate response to TCS. Patients were randomised 3:1:3 to dupilumab 300 mg every week (qw), 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), or placebo. Patients received a standardised regimen of concomitant low-/medium-potency TCS that could be tapered or stopped as necessary or topical calcineurin inhibitors in areas inadvisable for TCS. Efficacy data were available for 740 (Week 16) and 623 (Week 52) patients; safety data for 740 patients (Week 52). Significantly more patients receiving dupilumab + TCS achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score 0/1 and ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline (Week 16: 39.2%/38.7% vs 12.4% [qw + TCS/q2w + TCS vs placebo + TCS]; Week 52: 40.0%/36.0% vs 12.5%), 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50) (Week 16: 78.1%/80.2% vs 37.5%; Week 52: 70.0%/78.7% vs 29.9%), EASI-75 (Week 16: 63.9%/68.9% vs 23.2%; Week 52: 64.1%/65.2% vs 21.6%), EASI-90 (Week 16: 43.3%/39.6% vs 11.1%; Week 52: 50.7%/50.6% vs 15.5%), or a ≥ 4-point improvement in peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (Week 16: 50.8%/58.8% vs 19.7%; Week 52: 39.0%/51.2% vs 12.9%) (P < 0.0001 vs placebo + TCS, each comparison). Treatment groups had similar adverse/serious adverse event rates and no significant laboratory abnormalities. Dupilumab + TCS-treated patients reported numerically higher rates of conjunctivitis (19.4%/13.6% vs 7.9%) and injection-site reactions (20.0%/16.4% vs 7.9%); placebo + TCS-treated patients reported more non-herpetic skin infections (8.3%/10.9% vs 17.8%) and AD flares (12.7%/13.6% vs 41.3%). Long-term treatment with dupilumab and concomitant topical medications significantly improved AD signs and symptoms, including pruritus, and showed an acceptable safety profile. Research sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02260986. Editorial assistance provided by Manuela Pigors, PhD and Sven Holm, PhD of Excerpta Medica, funded by Sanofi Genzyme and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Refer to poster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternal Medicine JournalSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207