MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2751303173 · doi:10.1111/imj.67_13578

P67: LONG‐TERM MANAGEMENT OF MODERATE‐TO‐SEVERE ATOPIC DERMATITIS WITH DUPILUMAB AND CONCOMITANT TOPICAL CORTICOSTEROIDS: A 1‐YEAR RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO‐CONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL (CHRONOS)

2017· article· en· W2751303173 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Blauvelt, Melinda Gooderham, Peter Foley, Griffiths Cem, JC Cather, M. de Bruin-Weller, Xiaoping Zhu, Bolanle Akinlade, Graham NMH, Gianluca Pirozzi, Brad Shumel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternal Medicine Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsSKiN Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEczema Area and Severity IndexAtopic dermatitisDupilumabPlaceboConcomitantRegimenInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialPlacebo-controlled studyClinical endpointAdverse effectDermatologyDouble blindPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-4-receptor-alpha monoclonal antibody, plus concomitant topical corticosteroids (TCS) were evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). CHRONOS (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02260986) was a 1-year, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study in adults with moderate-to-severe AD and an inadequate response to TCS. Patients were randomised 3:1:3 to dupilumab 300 mg every week (qw), 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), or placebo. Patients received a standardised regimen of concomitant low-/medium-potency TCS that could be tapered or stopped as necessary or topical calcineurin inhibitors in areas inadvisable for TCS. Efficacy data were available for 740 (Week 16) and 623 (Week 52) patients; safety data for 740 patients (Week 52). Significantly more patients receiving dupilumab + TCS achieved an Investigator’s Global Assessment score 0/1 and ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline (Week 16: 39.2%/38.7% vs 12.4% [qw + TCS/q2w + TCS vs placebo + TCS]; Week 52: 40.0%/36.0% vs 12.5%), 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50) (Week 16: 78.1%/80.2% vs 37.5%; Week 52: 70.0%/78.7% vs 29.9%), EASI-75 (Week 16: 63.9%/68.9% vs 23.2%; Week 52: 64.1%/65.2% vs 21.6%), EASI-90 (Week 16: 43.3%/39.6% vs 11.1%; Week 52: 50.7%/50.6% vs 15.5%), or a ≥ 4-point improvement in peak pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (Week 16: 50.8%/58.8% vs 19.7%; Week 52: 39.0%/51.2% vs 12.9%) (P < 0.0001 vs placebo + TCS, each comparison). Treatment groups had similar adverse/serious adverse event rates and no significant laboratory abnormalities. Dupilumab + TCS-treated patients reported numerically higher rates of conjunctivitis (19.4%/13.6% vs 7.9%) and injection-site reactions (20.0%/16.4% vs 7.9%); placebo + TCS-treated patients reported more non-herpetic skin infections (8.3%/10.9% vs 17.8%) and AD flares (12.7%/13.6% vs 41.3%). Long-term treatment with dupilumab and concomitant topical medications significantly improved AD signs and symptoms, including pruritus, and showed an acceptable safety profile. Research sponsored by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02260986. Editorial assistance provided by Manuela Pigors, PhD and Sven Holm, PhD of Excerpta Medica, funded by Sanofi Genzyme and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Refer to poster.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternal Medicine JournalSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207