MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754254867 · doi:10.2118/187520-ms

A Quantitative and Visual Experimental Study: Effect of Fracture Roughness on Proppant Transport in a Vertical Fracture

2017· article· en· W2754254867 on OpenAlex
Hai Huang, Tayfun Babadagli, Huazhou Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Eastern Regional Meeting · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsFracture (geology)GeologySurface finishFractal dimensionGeotechnical engineeringSurface roughnessFractalHydraulic fracturingMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The roughness of fractures may play an important role in affecting the migration and placement of proppants during hydraulic fracturing operations. Previous studies focused on investigating the proppant transport in smooth vertical fractures, which did not consider the effect of the fracture-surface roughness. We examine the migration of proppants in rough and vertical fractures and then quantitatively reveal the effect of roughness on the instantaneous proppant transport and final proppant placement. Two types of rock samples (marble and granite) are fractured with the Brazilian test and molded to manufacture 20 × 20 × 5 cm transparent replicas. The surface roughness of these rock samples was first characterized by fractal dimensions. Then, the dyed fracturing fluid with a given proppant loading was injected into the rough vertical fracture. In each test, the inlet pressures were continuously monitored in order to obtain the differential pressure across the fracture model while the proppants were being transported in the fracture. The process was videotaped to real-time track the proppant distribution in the rough fracture. The proppant-transport behavior in the rough and vertical fracture was observed to be totally different from that in the smooth fracture. The major experimental findings include the following: 1) The proppant in a rough vertical fracture does not progress as a regular sand bank that commonly occurs in the smooth fracture, but rather an irregular-shape sand clusters with fractal characteristics; 2) In the rough and vertical fracture, the phenomenon of proppant bridging is visually observed, and such phenomenon is more likely to occur in the location with a larger roughness height. This implies rough fracture could promote a wider spreading of the proppant in the fracture compared to smooth fractures, and; 3) The existence of roughness enhances the vertical displacement of fluid containing proppants. These effects are also favorable for obtaining a better filling of the proppants in the fracture. Our experimental study reveals the mechanisms of proppant transport and distribution in real vertical fractures under the influence of roughness effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it