MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754634911 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1561

Prospective Evaluation of Accelerate Pheno™ System (AXDX) Version 1.1 for Reducing Turn-Around-Time (TAT) in Identification/Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (ID/AST) of Gram-Negative Bacilli (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC) using AXDX PhenoTest™ BC Kits

2017· article· en· W2754634911 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Willey, Bryan Gascon, Samantha Lee, Vita Koren, Salman Surangiwala, Aimee Paterson, Pauline Lo, Tony Mazzulli, Susan M. Poutanen

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimicrobialMedicineGramBacilliIdentification (biology)MicrobiologyBlood cultureAntibioticsBiologyBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated AXDX (uses FISH/real-time microscopy to obtain ID/AST direct from +BC in <7h) for accuracy against reference mass spectrometry (MS, VITEK® MS, bioMérieux) and broth microdilution (BMD), respectively. AXDX TAT was timed against current reporting for ID using MS and VITEK®2 (VT2, bioMérieux) for AST (VT2 data not presented). Blood from 173 semi-consecutive +BC tested in BacT/Alert® (bioMérieux) with GNB on Gram were tested in AXDX. Susceptible/intermediate/resistant (S/I/R) interpretations were as per CLSI-M100-S27 for cefazolin (CFZ), ceftriaxone (CRO), ceftazidime (CAZ), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), ertapenem (ETP), meropenem (MEM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (GM), tobramycin (TOB), and amikacin (AN). ID and AST results were combined across GNB-genera for assessment as per Cumitech 31A for ≥90% agreements [identificatoin, essential (EA); categorical (CA)] and errors [very major (VME) <3%; combined major/minor (ME/mE) <7%]. 142 (82.1%) AXDX results were evaluable (ID-agreed/AST-reported) for 78 Escherichia coli, 27 Klebsiella species, 17 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 8 Serratia marcescens, 3 Proteus mirabilis, 2 Acinetobacter baumannii and 2 Citrobacter freundii as seen tabulated below. Limits were exceeded for underlined values but 95% confidence intervals (CI) overlapped acceptable limits except in values marked with asterisks [EA (CAZ: 68.7–82.7), ME/mE (CFZ: 5.1–16.8; CAZ: 10–21.9; TZP: 9.2–20.8)]. VME were not evaluable (NE) for TZP, ETP, MEM, or AN due to insufficient numbers of GNB resistant to these agents. ID/AST TAT means (ranges) for AXDX were 1:21h (1:19–1:24h)/6:38h (6:30–6:59h) conmpared to MS/VT2 of 8:49h (2:49–76:48h)/38:23h (19:44–64:22h), respectively; paired t-tests, P < 0.0001/P < 0.0001; difference of means: 8:17h (95% CI:6:55–9:38h)/28:41h (95% CI:26:53–30:29h)]. These data suggest AXDX will significantly reduce ID/AST TAT in GNB bacteremia (ID: 8:49h to 1:21h; AST: 38:23h to 6:38h) with potential to significantly improve patient outcomes. Acceptable accuracy was achieved for ID and AST for most agents. A limitation was the lack of GNB causing bacteremia with resistance to AN, TZP, ETP or MEM in during evaluation. B. M. Willey, Mount Sinai Hospital: Investigator, Educational support S. M. Poutanen, Accelerate Diagnostics: Research Contractor and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207