MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2754634911 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.1561

Prospective Evaluation of Accelerate Pheno™ System (AXDX) Version 1.1 for Reducing Turn-Around-Time (TAT) in Identification/Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (ID/AST) of Gram-Negative Bacilli (GNB) from Positive Blood Cultures (+BC) using AXDX PhenoTest™ BC Kits

2017· article· en· W2754634911 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Willey, Bryan Gascon, Samantha Lee, Vita Koren, Salman Surangiwala, Aimee Paterson, Pauline Lo, Tony Mazzulli, Susan M. Poutanen

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimicrobialMedicineGramBacilliIdentification (biology)MicrobiologyBlood cultureAntibioticsBiologyBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated AXDX (uses FISH/real-time microscopy to obtain ID/AST direct from +BC in <7h) for accuracy against reference mass spectrometry (MS, VITEK® MS, bioMérieux) and broth microdilution (BMD), respectively. AXDX TAT was timed against current reporting for ID using MS and VITEK®2 (VT2, bioMérieux) for AST (VT2 data not presented). Blood from 173 semi-consecutive +BC tested in BacT/Alert® (bioMérieux) with GNB on Gram were tested in AXDX. Susceptible/intermediate/resistant (S/I/R) interpretations were as per CLSI-M100-S27 for cefazolin (CFZ), ceftriaxone (CRO), ceftazidime (CAZ), piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), ertapenem (ETP), meropenem (MEM), ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (GM), tobramycin (TOB), and amikacin (AN). ID and AST results were combined across GNB-genera for assessment as per Cumitech 31A for ≥90% agreements [identificatoin, essential (EA); categorical (CA)] and errors [very major (VME) <3%; combined major/minor (ME/mE) <7%]. 142 (82.1%) AXDX results were evaluable (ID-agreed/AST-reported) for 78 Escherichia coli, 27 Klebsiella species, 17 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 Enterobacter cloacae, 8 Serratia marcescens, 3 Proteus mirabilis, 2 Acinetobacter baumannii and 2 Citrobacter freundii as seen tabulated below. Limits were exceeded for underlined values but 95% confidence intervals (CI) overlapped acceptable limits except in values marked with asterisks [EA (CAZ: 68.7–82.7), ME/mE (CFZ: 5.1–16.8; CAZ: 10–21.9; TZP: 9.2–20.8)]. VME were not evaluable (NE) for TZP, ETP, MEM, or AN due to insufficient numbers of GNB resistant to these agents. ID/AST TAT means (ranges) for AXDX were 1:21h (1:19–1:24h)/6:38h (6:30–6:59h) conmpared to MS/VT2 of 8:49h (2:49–76:48h)/38:23h (19:44–64:22h), respectively; paired t-tests, P < 0.0001/P < 0.0001; difference of means: 8:17h (95% CI:6:55–9:38h)/28:41h (95% CI:26:53–30:29h)]. These data suggest AXDX will significantly reduce ID/AST TAT in GNB bacteremia (ID: 8:49h to 1:21h; AST: 38:23h to 6:38h) with potential to significantly improve patient outcomes. Acceptable accuracy was achieved for ID and AST for most agents. A limitation was the lack of GNB causing bacteremia with resistance to AN, TZP, ETP or MEM in during evaluation. B. M. Willey, Mount Sinai Hospital: Investigator, Educational support S. M. Poutanen, Accelerate Diagnostics: Research Contractor and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207