A Screening System for Evaluating Cell Extension Formation, Collagen Compaction, and Degradation in Drug Discovery
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The generation of cell extensions is critical for matrix remodeling in tissue invasion by cancer cells, but current methods for identifying molecules that regulate cell extension formation and matrix remodeling are not well adapted for screening purposes. We applied a grid-supported, floating collagen gel system (~100 Pa stiffness) to examine cell extension formation, collagen compaction, and collagen degradation in a single assay. With the use of cultured diploid fibroblasts, a fibroblast cell line, and two cancer cell lines, we found that compared with attached collagen gels (~2800 Pa), the mean number and length of cell extensions were respectively greater in the floating gels. In assessing specific processes in cell extension formation, compared with controls, the number of cell extensions was reduced by latrunculin B, β1 integrin blockade, and a formin FH2 domain inhibitor. Screening of a kinase inhibitor library (480 compounds) with the floating gel assay showed that compared with vehicle-treated cells, there were large reductions of collagen compaction, pericellular collagen degradation, and number of cell extensions after treatment with SB431542, SIS3, Fasudil, GSK650394, and PKC-412. These data indicate that the grid-supported floating collagen gel model can be used to screen for inhibitors of cell extension formation and critical matrix remodeling events associated with cancer cell invasion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it