MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2763771642 · doi:10.1093/pch/9.suppl_a.54ab

115 Clinical Decision Making in the Care of Preterm Infants at Risk of BPD Varies Significantly between Canadian Neonatologists

2004· article· en· W2763771642 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CMG Cronin, N Singhal, Seung‐Koo Lee, MMK Seshia, CK Chan, R. Walker, K Sankaran, Arne Ohlsson, Derek Matthew, W Petranick, John Minski

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBronchopulmonary dysplasiaWeaningSupplemental oxygenRespiratory careIntubationRespiratory therapistPediatricsClinical PracticeEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineGestational ageAnesthesiaNursingPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Neonatal Network is studying the effects of collaborative quality improvement on NICU outcomes, including Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD). To describe common decision-making criteria in respiratory care of newborns, variation between practitioners, and correlation of practice with scientific evidence. We developed a 53-item questionnaire that examined clinical practice re: respiratory support, monitoring, weaning protocols, discharge criteria, use of diagnostic tests, fluids and medications, and personnel. Most questions were multiple choice. The questionnaire was distributed to all staff neonatologists in the study network in summer 2003. 28 neonatologists completed surveys. Management varied considerably among respondents. Forty-five percent would administer surfactant immediately after intubation to an infant <28 weeks gestation with RDS, while 48% would require x-ray confirmation. Thirty-four percent used high frequency ventilation routinely. The modal combination of monitoring was arterial line plus oxygen saturation monitor. Fifty percent used computerized respiratory waveforms to guide decision-making. Between rounds, decisions about respiratory care were made by Fellows (16), Residents (14), Respiratory Therapists (10) Nurse Practitioners (11), Clinical Assistants (9) Nurses (1) or Neonatologists (1). Fifty percent of clinicians reported using weaning protocols for RDS, usually administered by RTs. For preterm infants with RDS, the range of preferred maximum PaO2 was 60–90 torr; preferred maximum PaCO2, 45 torr to no limit; preferred minimum PaCO2, 30–45 torr. The modal range of preferred oxygen saturation was 88–92% (range 85–95%). For infants developing BPD, modal maximum and minimum PaCO2 was 60 and 40 torr, respectively. There was no consistent preferred range of oxygen saturation for BPD (range 85–98%). Many modes of ventilation were preferred; 13 of 28 respondents used volume guarantee during the weaning phase. FiO2 was used as a criterion of extubation readiness in 23/28 cases, but clinical criteria were inconsistent. Forty-eight percent used methylxanthines as an aid to extubation. The maximum CPAP used ranged from 5 to >10 cm H2O. Use of nasal flow oxygen was very inconsistent. Seven percent of clinicians never discharged infants on oxygen; 4% did so routinely. Seventeen clinicians reported using postnatal steroids for the treatment of BPD; 11 administered them systemically. The timing, dose and consent policies were not consistent. Vitamins A or E were not routinely used. Canadian neonatologists' clinical decision making varies considerably even when scientific evidence is clear. Ongoing studies will address the influence of participation in benchmarking networks on the standardization of care and on clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→