Stackelberg Equilibria of an Anti-Jamming Game in Cooperative Cognitive Radio Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deceiving attacker is a radio jammer, equipped with a cognitive radio (CR) platform, which senses the frequency spectrum and launches jamming actions to block, mask, or emulate the legitimate active wireless connections. Using the IEEE 802.22 CR network (CRN) as a basis, this paper proposes a set of deception-based defense strategies to protect the CRNs from the deceiving attack. The Stackelberg framework is adopted in the formulation of the security problem to account for the attacker's reconnaissance capabilities. To this end, the Stackelberg equilibria between the attacker(s) and the defending CRs are calculated under the two cases when the attacker(s) and the defending CRs know and are uncertain about the primary user activity. The backward induction method is used to calculate the points of SE in the formulated security game. Both theoretical analysis and numerical results show that the defending CRs can decrease the probability of success of the deceiving attack to nearly 0% when the CRs have the incentive to defend the frequency channel(s).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it