MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765899161 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.015

A Targetable EGFR-Dependent Tumor-Initiating Program in Breast Cancer

2017· article· en· W2765899161 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Savage, Alexis Blanchet-Cohen, Timothée Revil, Dunarel Badescu, Sadiq M.I. Saleh, Yu-Chang Wang, Dongmei Zuo, Leah Liu, Nicholas Bertos, Valentina Muñoz-Ramos, Mark Basik, Kevin Petrecca, Jamil Asselah, Sarkis Meterissian, Marie‐Christine Guiot, Atilla Ömeroğlu, Claudia L. Kleinman, Morag Park, Jiannis Ragoussis

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation CentreJewish General HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéGenome CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMcGill University Health CentreStand Up To CancerMcGill University
KeywordsGefitinibEpidermal growth factor receptorCancer researchBreast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerEGFR inhibitorsBiologyMetastatic breast cancerCancerMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Therapies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have variable and unpredictable responses in breast cancer. Screening triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), we identify a subset responsive to EGFR inhibition by gefitinib, which displays heterogeneous expression of wild-type EGFR. Deep single-cell RNA sequencing of 3,500 cells from an exceptional responder identified subpopulations displaying distinct biological features, where elevated EGFR expression was significantly enriched in a mesenchymal/stem-like cellular cluster. Sorted EGFRhi subpopulations exhibited enhanced stem-like features, including ALDH activity, sphere-forming efficiency, and tumorigenic and metastatic potential. EGFRhi cells gave rise to EGFRhi and EGFRlo cells in primary and metastatic tumors, demonstrating an EGFR-dependent expansion and hierarchical state transition. Similar tumorigenic EGFRhi subpopulations were identified in independent PDXs, where heterogeneous EGFR expression correlated with gefitinib sensitivity. This provides new understanding for an EGFR-dependent hierarchy in TNBC and for patient stratification for therapeutic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207