MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2766110579 · doi:10.1139/gen-2017-0026

Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with size, shape, and parr mark traits using first- and second-generation backcrosses between European and North American Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>)

2017· article· en· W2766110579 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Stephanie Pedersen, Lei Liu, Brian D. Glebe, Steven Leadbeater, Sigbjørn Lien, Elizabeth G. Boulding

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaUniversity of Guelph
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusBiologySalmoBackcrossingSubspeciesGenetic architectureGeneticsIntrogressionEvolutionary biologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismPhenotypic traitTraitPurebredZoologyPhenotypeGeneGenotypeFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryBreed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Little is known about the genetic architecture of traits important for salmonid restoration ecology. We mapped quantitative trait loci (QTL) using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for juvenile body length, weight, shape, and vertical skin pigmentation patterns (parr marks) within three hybrid backcross families between European and North American subspecies of Atlantic salmon. Amounts of variation in skin colour and pattern quantified in the two second-generation transAtlantic families exceeded the ranges seen in purebred populations. GridQTL analyses using low-density female-specific linkage maps detected QTL showing experiment-wide significance on Ssa02, Ssa03, Ssa09, Ssa11, Ssa19, and Ssa26/28 for both length and weight; on Ssa04 and Ssa23 for parr mark number; on Ssa09 and Ssa13 for parr mark contrast; and on Ssa05, Ssa07, Ssa10, Ssa11, Ssa18, Ssa23, and Ssa26/28 for geometric morphometric shape coordinates. Pleiotrophic QTL on Ssa11 affected length, weight, and shape. No QTL was found that explained more than 10% of the phenotypic variance in pigmentation or shape traits. Each QTL was approximately positioned on the physical map of the Atlantic salmon genome. Some QTL locations confirmed previous studies but many were new. Studies like ours may increase the success of salmon restoration projects by enabling better phenotypic and genetic matching between introduced and extirpated strains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→