MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2768086853 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nox168.209

CSIG-15. PROTEOMIC AND PHOSPHOPROTEOMIC ANALYSIS OF HUMAN MEDULLOBLASTOMA REVEALS DISTINCT ACTIVATED PATHWAYS BETWEEN SUBGROUPS

2017· article· en· W2768086853 on OpenAlexaff
Antoine Forget, Loredana Martignetti, Sebastian Brabetz, Daniel Picard, Stéphanie Puget, Laurence Calzone, Patrick Poullet, Arnau Montagud, Stéphane Liva, Florent Dingli, Guillaume Arras, Hua Yu, Audrey Mercier, Célio Pouponnot, Damarys Loew, Franck Bourdeaut, Christelle Dufour, Pascale Varlet, Michael D. Taylor, Marcel Kool, Stefan M. Pfister, Emmanuel Barillot, Marc Remke, Olivier Ayrault

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaBiologyWnt signaling pathwayPhosphorylationComputational biologyRNASignal transductionGeneGeneticsBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deregulations in fundamental signaling pathways are key events in pathogenesis of cancer. One intriguing illustration that still holds blind spots is the pediatric brain tumor arising from the developing cerebellum: medulloblastoma (MB). Extensive high-throughput sequencing led to the characterization of four MB subgroups (WNT, SHH, Group 3 and Group 4) delineated with distinct molecular signatures and clinical outcomes. However, up-to-date these analyses have not attained the global comprehension of their dynamic network complexity. Wishing to get a comprehensive view of all MB subgroups we employed a multi-scale analysis to integrate genomic copy number (CN), DNA methylation, mRNA, protein and phosphorylation levels across 38 flash frozen primary human MBs (5 WNT, 10 SHH, 10 Group 3 and 13 Group 4). Our proteomic analysis allows to distinguish the four MB subgroups. Interestingly, Group 4 MB is particularly distinguishable from the other subgroups based on phosphorylation profile. Moreover, integration of all omic layers by similarity network fusion allowed precise definition of the four subgroups. Correlation studies between CN, RNA and protein levels showed convergent effects of CN alterations toward cell cycle, RNA and nucleotide metabolism. Importantly, protein levels were poorly predicted by levels of corresponding mRNA with consequence on active pathway prediction. This observation was of particular importance in Group 4 MB in which protein and phosphorylation levels allowed the identification of pathways that were unable to be predicted by RNA data. Ultimately, this led us to the characterization of potential biomarkers of Group 4 MB and promising targetable pathways across subgroups. Altogether, combined multi-scale analyses of MB have allowed us to identify and prioritize novel molecular drivers involved in human MB genesis and progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207