Hypertension‐evoked RhoA activity in vascular smooth muscle cells requires RGS5
Bibliographic record
Abstract
G protein–mediated signaling plays a decisive role in blood pressure regulation and the phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs); however, the relevance of proteins that restrict G protein activity is not well characterized in this context. Here, we investigated the influence of regulator of G protein signaling 5 (RGS5), an inhibitor of Gα q/11 and Gα i/o activity, on blood pressure and the VSMC phenotype during experimental hypertension. In mice, loss of RGS5 did not affect baseline blood pressure, but prevented hypertension‐induced structural remodeling. RGS5‐deficient arterial VSMCs did not acquire a synthetic phenotype as evidenced by their inability to decrease the abundance of contractile markers—α‐smooth muscle actin and smooth muscle‐myosin heavy chain—or to proliferate under these conditions. Mechanistically, hypertensive pressure levels or biomechanical stretch are sufficient to increase the expression of RGS5. Loss of RGS5 severely impairs the activation of RhoA and stress fiber formation. In stretch‐exposed VSMCs, RhoA activity was amplified upon inhibition of PKC, which mimics the downstream effects evoked by RGS5‐mediated inhibition of Gα q/11 signaling. Collectively, our findings underline that RhoA activation may depend on the restriction of G protein activity and identify RGS5 as a mechanosensitive regulatory protein that is required to promote the synthetic VSMC phenotype as a prerequisite for structural renovation of the arterial wall during hypertension.— Arnold, C., Demirel, E., Feldner, A., Genove, G., Zhang, H., Sticht, C., Wieland, T., Hecker, M., Heximer, S., Korff, T. Hypertension‐evoked RhoA activity in vascular smooth muscle cells requires RGS5. FASEB J. 32, 2021–2035 (2018). www.fasebj.org
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".