Trifluoromethyl-Substituted Iridium(III) Complexes: From Photophysics to Photooxidation of a Biological Target
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photodynamic therapeutic agents are of key interest in developing new strategies to develop more specific and efficient anticancer treatments. In comparison to classical chemotherapeutic agents, the activity of photodynamic therapeutic compounds can be finely controlled thanks to the light triggering of their photoreactivity. The development of type I photosensitizing agents, which do not rely on the production of ROS, is highly desirable. In this context, we developed new iridium(III) complexes which are able to photoreact with biomolecules; namely, our Ir(III) complexes can oxidize guanine residues under visible light irradiation. We report the synthesis and extensive photophysical characterization of four new Ir(III) complexes, [Ir(ppyCF 3 ) 2 (N^N)] + [ppyCF 3 = 2-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)pyridine) and N^N = 2,2′-dipyridyl (bpy); 2-(pyridin-2-yl)pyrazine (pzpy); 2,2′-bipyrazine (bpz); 1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene (TAP)]. In addition to an extensive experimental and theoretical study of the photophysics of these complexes, we characterize their photoreactivity toward model redox-active targets and the relevant biological target, the guanine base. We demonstrate that photoinduced electron transfer takes place between the excited Ir(III) complex and guanine which leads to the formation of stable photoproducts, indicating that the targeted guanine is irreversibly damaged. These results pave the way to the elaboration of new type I photosensitizers for targeting cancerous cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".