MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluating the spatial ecology of anthrax in North America: examining epidemiological components across multiple geographic scales using a GIS-based approach

2006· dissertation· en· W2789355936 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jason K. Blackburn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicZoonotic diseases and public health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCRDF Global
KeywordsGeographyWildlifeEcologyOutbreakBacillus anthracisSpatial epidemiologyRange (aeronautics)DisjunctEnvironmental niche modellingHabitatBiosecurityTransmission (telecommunications)Ecological nicheBiologyCartographyPopulationEpidemiologyDemographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation explores the spatial ecology and potential pathways of infection of anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, in North America. A multi-scale approach was used to evaluate the components required for disease agent survival in the environment, interactions with wildlife, and the potential role that vectors play in anthrax transmission. First, ecological niche modeling with the Genetic Algorithm for Rule-set Production (GARP) was used to predict the geographic distribution of anthrax in the continental U.S. using case data from outbreaks between 1957 and 2005. These results were then used to produce the first quantitative, continental scale predictions of anthrax in Mexico. At the meso-scale, the route of transmission in white-tailed deer is unknown, despite a large number of outbreaks in wild deer in Texas in recent years (2001 – 2005). To determine the interactions between deer and potential anthrax sources, two pilot studies were conducted on 1) the distribution of biting flies in relation to anthrax cases to evaluate the potential role of hematophagous flies as vectors, and 2) the summer home ranges of deer in relation to fly densities and carcass locations. The results of the GARP studies support the use of the technique for modeling the niche of this disease and suggest a central corridor of anthrax habitat from southwest Texas to the Canadian border, with disjunct areas in the Pacific Northwest and California. Mexico’s predicted areas were extensions of the Texas and California ranges. The deer study suggests that deer interactions with spores occur within a limited home range in Texas and long-distance movement of spores is unlikely by individual deer. Biting fly densities were highest in areas of known anthrax infection and lowest in areas where case-positive deer have not been identified, suggesting that flies may play a role in disease transmission, either through mechanical transmission or through increased nuisance that leads to immuno-suppression in deer. This dissertation presents the first continental-scale predictions for the geographic distribution of anthrax in the U.S. and Mexico. Additionally, this is the first known study to evaluate spatial patterns between known cases, fly densities, and animal movements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.156
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicZoonotic diseases and public healthFrench-language works237,207