Accumulation and toxicity of lanthanum and neodymium in horticultural plants (<i>Brassica chinensis</i> L. and <i>Helianthus annuus</i> L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The dose‐response of two horticultural plant species ( Brassica chinensis L., and Helianthus annuus L.) to two light Rare Earth Elements (REEs), namely lanthanum and neodymium, in‐vitro, was investigated. The phytotoxicity of the studied REEs was determined by measuring the aboveground and belowground biomass of the plant parts, and the chlorophyll production. Based on these measurements, inhibition concentration causing 50 % decrease (IC50) in plant biomass and total chlorophyll were calculated. Moreover, the available ionic species of La and Nd in the media for plant uptake were predicted using Visual MINTEQ. The concentration of these elements were measured in different plant tissues to assay the ability of these plants to hyperaccumulate La and Nd. It was observed that La and Nd, at lower dosages (<∼100 mg/kg), had hormetic effects, respectively, on the shoot and root of H. annuus L. Also, Nd had stimulatory effects on the number of leaves and chlorophyll content of B. chinensis L. However, these two elements were toxic to both plants at higher media concentrations. Between the two plant species, H. annuus L. was more resistant to the studied REEs when compared to B. chinensis L. IC50 values of La for the roots and shoots of both plant species (139–201 mg/kg) were markedly smaller when compared to IC50 values of Nd (222–333 mg/kg). Thus, between the two assayed elements, La was more toxic to the plants. Translocation factors for La and Nd were not high enough to consider the plant species as hyperaccumulators.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".