MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790350741 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.035

A35 GENOME WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY OF ABNORMAL INTESTINAL PERMEABILITY IN HEALTHY FIRST DEGREE RELATIVES OF CROHN’S PATIENTS

2018· article· en· W2790350741 on OpenAlexaff
Williams Turpin, Larbi Bedrani, Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia, Michelle I. Smith, David S. Guttman, Karen Madsen, Anne M. Griffiths, Paul Moayyedi, Remo Panaccione, Hien Q. Huynh, Levinus A. Dieleman, A. Hillary Steinhart, Guy Aumais, Mark S. Silverberg, Xiu-tian Wei, Andrew D. Paterson, Kenneth Croitoru

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryPublic Health OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaMount Sinai HospitalLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypingImputation (statistics)Genome-wide association studyMinor allele frequencyMedicineCohortLactuloseHaplotypeGenotypeInternal medicineGastroenterologyBiologyGeneticsGeneMissing data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increased intestinal permeability (IP) is thought to be a risk factor for the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our recent study has demonstrated that known IBD risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were not associated with IP, while smoking status and age were two independent factors associated with increased IP. To identify other genetic loci influencing IP, we performed a genome wide association study (GWAS) among healthy first-degree relatives of CD patients with increased and normal IP. IP was measured with high-pressure liquid chromatography of timed urine collection after ingestion of two saccharide probes, lactulose and mannitol. For each subject, the lactulose–mannitol ratio (LacMan ratio) was calculated as the fractional excretion of lactulose divided by that of mannitol. A LacMan ratio >0.025 was considered as abnormal IP. Genotyping was performed using the HumanCoreEXOME chip and ImmunoChip platform. Imputation was performed using the Michigan server using the Haplotype Reference Consortium v1.1 panel. Imputation was quality controlled and SNPs with a minor allele frequency < 5% or R square <0.3 were removed. Associations were tested using the gee framework that accounts for family correlation, age (age squared), gender, smoking, and the first three genetic principal components. LacMan ratio was log(10) transformed before statistical analysis. A total of 1,075 healthy individuals enrolled in the Gene-environment-microbe (GEM) cohort study with both IP and genotyping data were included. In this cohort 17.8% of individuals had abnormal IP. A total of 7.8 million SNPs were imputed and 5.7 million SNPs were included in the analysis after quality control. When the data were not dichotomized (abnormal versus normal IP) the genomic inflation was of 1.03 compared to 1.04 using dichotomized data. No SNP reached genome wide significance (P> 5 × 10–8). However 58 loci showed suggestive associations e.g. SGCG, RBFOX3, PSMG1, DAB2, SVIL (p<9.1 × 10–6). We did not find robust genetic wide associations with IP. Although multivariate analysis controlling for major contributing factors to IP showed only a few SNP with nominal association these failed to reach the conventional GWAS threshold (P< 5 × 10–8). This may be due to the power of the study with only 1,075 subjects. Submitted on behalf of behalf of the CCC IBD GEM Project research team. CCC, CIHRThe Helmsley Charitable Trust

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→