MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2791006533 · doi:10.1117/12.2292922

Ring navigation: an ultrasound-guided technique using real-time motion compensation for prostate biopsies

2018· article· en· W2791006533 on OpenAlexaff
David Tessier, Derek J. Gillies, Lori Gardi, Ashley Mercado, Aaron Fenster

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstateProstate cancerProstate biopsyMedicineUltrasoundMotion compensationMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyBiopsy3D ultrasoundComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate cancer has the second highest noncutaneous cancer incidence in men. Three-dimensional (3D) transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fused with a magnetic resonance image (MRI) is used to guide prostate biopsy as an alternative technique to conventional 2D TRUS sextant biopsy. The TRUS-MRI fusion technique can provide intraoperative needle guidance to suspicious cancer tissues identified on MRI, increasing the targeting capabilities of a physician. Currently, 3D TRUS-MR guided biopsy suffers from image and target misalignment caused by various forms of prostate motion. Thus, we previously developed a real-time motion compensation algorithm to align 2D and 3D TRUS images with an update rate around an ultrasound system frame rate. During clinical implementation, observations of image misalignment occurred when obtaining tissue samples near the left and right boundaries of the prostate. To minimize transducer translation on the rectal wall and avoid prostate motion and deformation, we are proposing the use of a 3D model-based ring navigation procedure. This navigation keeps the transducer positioned towards the centroid of the prostate when guiding the tracked biopsy gun to targets. Prostate biopsy was performed on three patients while using real-time motion compensation in the background. Our navigation approach was compared to a conventional 2D TRUS-guided procedure using approximately 20 2D and 3D TRUS image pairs and resulted in median [first quartile, third quartile] registration errors of 2.0 [1.3, 2.5] mm and 3.4 [1.5, 8.2] mm, respectively. Using our navigation approach, registration error and variability were reduced, potentially suggesting a more robust technique when performing continuous motion compensation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→