MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791214803 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.143

A142 INTER-OBSERVER AGREEMENT AND THE ROLE OF EDUCATIONAL TRAINING ON THE ENDOSCOPIC SCORING OF CROHN’S DISEASE

2018· article· en· W2791214803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseDiseaseSession (web analytics)Scoring systemGastroenterologyInternal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) focuses on the importance of mucosal healing, endoscopic scoring systems such as the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) are becoming important tools in the objective measurement of inflammation. Concern regarding inter-observer variability and feasibility has limited use of the SES-CD in the clinical setting. The study goal is to determine whether an educational program teaching endscopic scoring will improve performance and inter-observer agreement among trainees. Gastroenterology residents were provided with videos of seven ileocolonoscopies representative of a range of ileal and colonic Crohn’s disease severity. Participants individually scored the videos using the SES-CD. The residents then participated in a 1-hour educational session involving a didactic lecture with examples using the SES-CD led by a faculty member with expertise in IBD. Participants then re-scored the same videos. Five videos chosen randomly were also scored by IBD experts. Inter-observer agreement among gastroenterology trainees and expert scorers was calculated using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) obtained from the total SES-CD scores. Six gastroenterology residents completed the pre-training SES-CD scoring, attended the training session, and completed the post-training re-scoring. Three IBD expert scorers completed the scoring. The table below shows the inter-observer agreement among the different groups for the pre- and post-training scenarios. There was no change in inter-observer agreement among trainees or all scorers after the educational session. Among gastroenterology trainees and between trainees and expert scorers, there was good inter-observer agreement for SES-CD scores. There was very good inter-observer agreement among expert scorers. A 1-hour training session on endoscopic scoring did not improve inter-observer agreement. This study supports routine use of the SES-CD in the clinical setting to improve reporting consistency and aid in clinical evaluation however, a more intensive educational program to improve endoscopic scoring accuracy among trainees should be developed. Intra-class correlation coefficients and inter-observer agreement among gastroenterology trainees and IBD experts using the SES-CD ICC: intra-class correlation coefficients University of Toronto Gastroenterology Training Program

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it