Abstract P2-10-07: A prospective clinical utility study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay in the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER2 negative (HER2-), 1-3 node positive (N+) breast cancer (BC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: The 21-gene RS is routinely used in node negative ER+, HER2- BC to help guide chemotherapy treatment decision making. There is emerging use of the RS in limited N+ BC, though the results from the randomized clinical trial (RxPONDER) is pending. The objective of the study is to determine whether the results of the 21-gene RS will alter physician treatment decisions in ER+ HER2- limited N+ BC. Methods: Consenting patients (pts) with ER+, HER2-, 1-3 N+ (microscopic or macroscopic) early stage BC participated in this prospective, multi-center British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) study. Treating physicians completed a questionnaire after an initial visit with the patient to document their treatment recommendation before obtaining the RS assay. At a subsequent visit, the assay result and final treatment recommendations were discussed and physicians completed a second questionnaire on the final treatment plan. The statistical assumption of the study was based upon anticipating an overall treatment decision change rate (from chemo-hormonal therapy to hormone only, or vice-versa) to be at least 30%. Results: Out of 84 pts enrolled, 82 went on to have RS testing. 57% of pts had T1 tumors, 40% T2 and 2% T3 tumors. The majority of pts (77%) had N1 macroscopic disease compared to 23% that had microscopic nodal involvement. 63% of cases were grade 2, followed by 23% grade 1 and 14% grade 3. 60% of RS were low (<18), 33% intermediate (18-30) and 7% were high (>30). In 53% of cases there was an altered treatment plan (49% switched from chemo-hormonal therapy to hormone only, and 4% switched from hormone only to chemo-hormonal therapy). Of the 49% that switched to hormone only, 68% had a low RS and 33% had an intermediate RS. All 4% that switched to chemo-hormonal therapy had an intermittent RS. Conclusions: This multi-centered Canadian study showed that in 53% of cases, treatment recommendations were changed based on the RS. This suggests that there is clinical utility for the RS in 1-3 N+, ER+, and HER2- breast cancer. Citation Format: Sun J, Fenton D, Baxter S, Chan A, Roberts S, Feng X, Lohrisch C, Gelmon K, Shenkier T, Chia S. A prospective clinical utility study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay in the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER2 negative (HER2-), 1-3 node positive (N+) breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-07.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".