MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792685524 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.302

A301 GUT MICROBIOTA FROM A PATIENT WITH GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER INDUCES ANXIETY-LIKE BEHAVIOUR AND ALTERED BRAIN CHEMISTRY IN GNOTOBIOTIC MICE

2018· article· en· W2792685524 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Perez Guzman, Rebecca Anglin, Giada De Palma, Jun Lü, Ryan Potts, Mosewich Amber, Randi E. McCabe, Elena F. Verdú, Stephen M. Collins, Michael G. Surette, Přemysl Berčík

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyGeneralized anxiety disorderPathophysiologyGut–brain axisGut floraDepression (economics)FecesInternal medicineImmunologyMedicineBiologyEndocrinologyPsychiatryMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depression and anxiety have overlapping etiologies and their pathophysiology remains largely unknown. Accumulating data suggest that gut microbiota modulates brain function and behaviour and may play a role in the pathophysiology of depression and anxiety To investigate whether gut microbiota from patients with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) induces anxiety-like behaviour in gnotobiotic mice and whether this is accompanied by changes in brain chemistry and immune markers. Germ-free NIH Swiss mice (n=15) were colonized with microbiota from either a patient with GAD and history of depression (n=7) or from an age and sex-matched healthy control (HC) (n=8). Both the GAD patient (female, 19 years) and healthy control (female, 20 years) were well characterized and selected based on their Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) scores from a pool of participants of an ongoing clinical study. Three weeks post-colonization, the mice underwent behavioural assessment using standard psychometric tests. Stool β-defensin levels were measured by ELISA. Microbiota profiles were assessed by 16S rRNA based Illumina analysis. Lastly, BDNF expression in brain samples was measured by immunofluorescence and neural gene expression by Nanostring gene assay. GAD-colonized mice had a distinct microbiota profile from that of HC-colonized mice and each group clustered around their respective human donor. Fecal β-defensin levels were higher in the GAD patient than the HC (109.5ng/ml vs 18.01ng/ml). Similarly, mouse fecal β-defensin levels were significantly higher in GAD-colonized mice than in HC-colonized mice (M= 62.26 vs M= 29.10, p < 0.005). Mice colonized with GAD microbiota exhibited significantly greater anxiety and depressive-like behaviour than HC-colonized mice, as they spent less time in the center of the open field arena, buried a greater number of marbles, spent a greater time digging and remained more time immobile. GAD-colonized mice had increased BDNF expression in the amygdala but decreased expression in the hippocampus. GAD-colonized mice also exhibited differential expression of neural genes in both the amygdala and hippocampus. Our results suggest that GAD microbiota can induce anxiety and depressive-like behaviour, accompanied by elevated immune markers. This is associated with altered neural gene and BDNF expression in brain regions involved in emotional processing. Altogether, our data suggest that gut microbiota may contribute to the pathophysiology of anxiety and depression, at least in a subset of patients with signs of gut immune activation. These findings may lead to the development of novel biomarkers and treatments for mood disorders. CIHRNIH

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→