MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2793061384 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.063

DOP026 Efficacy and safety of dose escalation to tofacitinib 10 mg BID for patients with ulcerative colitis following loss of response on tofacitinib 5 mg BID maintenance therapy: results from OCTAVE open

2018· article· en· W2793061384 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce E. Sands, Alan C. Moss, Alessandro Armuzzi, John K. Marshall, James O. Lindsay, William J. Sandborn, Silvio Danese, Konstantinos Tsilkos, Nervin Lawendy, H Zhang, Gary S. Friedman, Gary Chan, Daniel W. Krichbaum, Chunyan Su

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTofacitinibMedicineOctave (electronics)Ulcerative colitisMaintenance therapyInternal medicineSurgeryGastroenterologyChemotherapyRheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated for ulcerative colitis (UC). We evaluated efficacy and safety of tofacitinib dose escalation in patients with UC participating in an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (LTE) study (OCTAVE Open, NCT01470612; data as of July 2016 [efficacy], December 2016 [safety]). OCTAVE1 included induction (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2), maintenance (OCTAVE Sustain) and LTE (OCTAVE Open) studies. OCTAVE Open included non-responders from OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2 and patients who completed or experienced treatment failure in OCTAVE Sustain. This analysis included the subpopulation of patients in OCTAVE Open who achieved clinical response following 8 weeks of induction therapy with tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID), entered OCTAVE Sustain receiving tofacitinib 5 mg BID and experienced treatment failure between Week 8 and up to Week 52, and subsequently entered OCTAVE Open and were escalated to tofacitinib 10 mg BID. Treatment failure was defined as increase ≥3 points from maintenance study baseline total Mayo score, plus increase in rectal bleeding subscore and endoscopic subscore (ES) ≥1 point and absolute ES ≥2 after ≥8 weeks of maintenance therapy. We evaluated clinical response, mucosal healing and remission at Months 2 and 12 of OCTAVE Open using non-responder imputation, and evaluated safety throughout the study. The dose escalation subpopulation comprised 58 patients in OCTAVE Open (out of 914 enrolled in the study). In patients escalated to tofacitinib 10 mg BID, clinical response, mucosal healing and remission rates were, respectively, 58.6%, 41.4% and 34.5% at Month 2, and 68.8%, 60.4% and 52.1% at Month 12 (Table). The safety profile of tofacitinib 10 mg BID in the dose escalation subpopulation was generally consistent with that observed in the overall study population (Table).2 For patients who lost initial clinical response to tofacitinib 10 mg BID induction therapy while on tofacitinib 5 mg BID maintenance therapy, dose escalation back to 10 mg BID recaptured clinical response for most patients by Month 2, and was well-tolerated, with no new safety signals. Interpretation of adverse event rates is limited due to the small sample size. 1. Sandborn WJ, et al. Tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med, 2017;376:1723–36. 2. Lichtenstein GR, et al. Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: open-label, long-term extension study. Am J Gastroenterol, 2017;112(S1) [Abstract 714].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207