INVESTIGATION OF HYBRID AND DIFFERENT CROSS-SECTION COMPOSITE DISC SPRINGS USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study the effectiveness of composite disc springs with different cross-section and hybrid type are determined by taking into account load capacities, masses, hybridization characteristics and costs of composite disc springs. The disc springs are analyzed with ABAQUS finite elements program by compressing between two rigid plates. The load-deflection characteristics obtained as a result of the analysis are compared with the analytic and experimental studies. Then different cross-section and hybrid composite disc springs were modeled. The trapeze A disc spring were confirmed to be more advantageous in terms of load capacity and mass by investigating the modeled disc springs. The effect of hybridization on hybrid disc springs with standard cross-section was investigated and optimum hybrid disc spring was determined according to cost and maximum loading capacity. Consequently, it is determined that carbon/epoxy plies used for outer layers are more advantageous. But the outer ply subjected to force was damaged thus this layer should be particularly reinforced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it