DEXTEROUS WORKSPACE OF A 3-<u>PR</u>RR KINEMATICALLY REDUNDANT PLANAR PARALLEL MANIPULATOR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the dexterous workspace of a general geometry 3-PRRR kinematically redundant planar parallel manipulator with six actuated joints, three of which are redundant, is determined. The 3-PRRR manipulator is an adaptation of the 3-RRR manipulator with a redundant prismatic actuator added to each leg. Obtaining the dexterous workspace by discretizing a large area around the manipulator and determining if each point is in the workspace is relatively simple though computationally inefficient. This work proposes a geometrical method to determine the dexterous workspace of a 3-PRRR planar parallel manipulator. With this method, an exact solution of the workspace boundaries is obtained. The geometrical method uses the four-bar mechanism analogy to determine the dexterous workspace. Though the method is applied to a 3-PRRR planar manipulator, it can be readily applied to any n-PRRR planar manipulator, where n is the number of chains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".