MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2802575274 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.25123

Somatic mutations in early onset luminal breast cancer

2018· article· en· W2802575274 on OpenAlexaffabout
Giselly Encinas, Veronica Y. Sabelnykova, Eduardo Carneiro de Lyra, Maria Lúcia Hirata Katayama, Simone Maistro, Pedro Wilson Mompean de Vasconcellos Valle, Gláucia Fernanda de Lima Pereira, Lívia Munhoz Rodrigues, Pedro Adolpho de Menezes Pacheco Serio, Ana Carolina Ribeiro Chaves de Gouvêa, Felipe C. Geyer, Ricardo Alves Basso, Fátima Solange Pasini, Maria del Pilar Esteves Diz, Maria Mitzi Brentani, João Carlos Guedes Sampaio Góes, Roger Chammas, Paul C. Boutros, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira

Bibliographic record

VenueOncotarget · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMUTYHGermline mutationBreast cancerCancer researchMLH1Frameshift mutationGermlineBiologyCHEK2CDKN2ABAP1CancerPALB2GeneticsMedicineMutationGeneDNA repairDNA mismatch repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

// Giselly Encinas 1, * , Veronica Y. Sabelnykova 2, * , Eduardo Carneiro de Lyra 3 , Maria Lucia Hirata Katayama 1 , Simone Maistro 1 , Pedro Wilson Mompean de Vasconcellos Valle 1 , Gláucia Fernanda de Lima Pereira 1 , Lívia Munhoz Rodrigues 1 , Pedro Adolpho de Menezes Pacheco Serio 1 , Ana Carolina Ribeiro Chaves de Gouvêa 1 , Felipe Correa Geyer 1 , Ricardo Alves Basso 3 , Fátima Solange Pasini 1 , Maria del Pilar Esteves Diz 1 , Maria Mitzi Brentani 1 , João Carlos Guedes Sampaio Góes 3 , Roger Chammas 1 , Paul C. Boutros 2, 4, 5 and Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira 1 1 Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada 3 Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer, São Paulo, Brazil 4 Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 5 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira, email: maria.folgueira@fm.usp.br Keywords: breast cancer; young patients; somatic mutation; germline mutation; luminal subtype Received: September 26, 2017      Accepted: March 06, 2018      Published: April 27, 2018 ABSTRACT Breast cancer arising in very young patients may be biologically distinct; however, these tumors have been less well studied. We characterized a group of very young patients (≤ 35 years) for BRCA germline mutation and for somatic mutations in luminal ( HER2 negative) breast cancer. Thirteen of 79 unselected very young patients were BRCA 1/2 germline mutation carriers. Of the non- BRCA tumors, eight with luminal subtype ( HER2 negative) were submitted for whole exome sequencing and integrated with 29 luminal samples from the COSMIC database or previous literature for analysis. We identified C to T single nucleotide variants (SNVs) as the most common base-change. A median of six candidate driver genes was mutated by SNVs in each sample and the most frequently mutated genes were PIK3CA, GATA3, TP53 and MAP2K4 . Potential cancer drivers affected in the present non- BRCA tumors include GRHL2, PIK3AP1, CACNA1E , SEMA6D , SMURF2 , RSBN1 and MTHFD2. Sixteen out of 37 luminal tumors (43%) harbored SNVs in DNA repair genes, such as ATR, BAP1, ERCC6, FANCD2, FANCL, MLH1 , MUTYH, PALB2, POLD1, POLE , RAD9A, RAD51 and TP53 , and 54% presented pathogenic mutations (frameshift or nonsense) in at least one gene involved in gene transcription. The differential biology of luminal early-age onset breast cancer needs a deeper genomic investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncotargetSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207