MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803239181 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy104.sp002

SP002CLINICAL OUTCOMES WITH MIGALASTAT IN PATIENTS WITH FABRY DISEASE BASED ON DEGREE OF RENAL IMPAIRMENT: RESULTS FROM PHASE 3 TRIALS

2018· article· en· W2803239181 on OpenAlexaff
Roser Torrá, Dominique P. Germain, Daniel G. Bichet, Raphael Schiffmann, Julie Yu, Jeffrey P. Castelli, Nina Skuban, Jay Barth

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFabry diseaseInternal medicineKidney diseaseDiseaseIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Fabry disease is a progressive X-linked disorder caused by functional deficiency of α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) that can lead to multiorgan disorders and early death. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone, restores lysosomal α-Gal A trafficking and enzyme activity by binding, inducing proper folding, and stabilizing amenable mutant forms of the enzyme. In the Phase 3 FACETS (NCT00925301) and ATTRACT (NCT01218659) trials, migalastat reduced disease substrate, stabilized renal function, and decreased cardiac mass in enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)-naive and ERT-experienced patients, respectively. Here, we assessed outcomes in these patients based on the degree of renal impairment at baseline. METHODS: In FACETS, ERT-naïve patients were randomized to receive 6 months of double-blind treatment with migalastat 150 mg every other day (QOD) or placebo, followed by an additional 18 months of migalastat. In ATTRACT, patients on ERT were randomized to receive 18 months of migalastat 150 mg QOD or continued on ERT, followed by an additional 12 months of migalastat. Clinical endpoints were evaluated for patients with amenable mutations based on baseline renal function (≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2; eGFRMDRD used for FACETS and mGFRiohexol used for ATTRACT); patients with baseline GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were excluded from the trials. RESULTS: Regardless of renal function, in FACETS, there was a reduction in kidney interstitial capillary GL-3 inclusions from baseline to month 6 with migalastat (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, -0.39, n=3; eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, -0.30, n=22) but not placebo (<60, 0.04, n=2; ≥60, 0.07, n=18). At month 24, lyso-Gb3 and left ventricular mass index (LVMi) decreased and white blood cell (WBC) α-Gal A activity increased with migalastat in both renal subgroups (Table). In ATTRACT, eGFRCKD-EPI remained stable, LVMi decreased, and WBC α-Gal A activity increased, and lyso-Gb3 remained low and stable during 18 months of treatment with migalastat in both renal subgroups (Table). CONCLUSIONS: In both Phase 3 studies, clinical outcomes in patients with Fabry disease and amenable mutations treated with migalastat were similar regardless of renal function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207