MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2810188242 · doi:10.3354/meps12677

Wasted effort: recruitment and persistence of kelp on algal turf

2018· article· en· W2810188242 on OpenAlexafffundabout
KE Burek, JM O’Brien, RE Scheibling

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersKillam TrustsArmy Research OfficeDalhousie UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNorthwestern University
KeywordsKelpHoldfastKelp forestEcologyBiologyAlgaeAbundance (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 600:3-19 (2018) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12677 FEATURE ARTICLE Wasted effort: recruitment and persistence of kelp on algal turf Kaitlin E. Burek*, John M. O’Brien, Robert E. Scheibling Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada *Corresponding author: kaitlin.burek@dal.ca ABSTRACT: Declines in kelp abundance over the past 3 decades have resulted in a shift from luxuriant kelp beds to extensive mats of turf-forming algae in Nova Scotia, Canada. With the reduced availability of open rocky substrate, kelps are increasingly recruiting to turf algae. At 3 sites near Halifax, we found that turf-attached kelp Saccharina latissima was generally restricted to smaller size classes (<50 cm length) than rock-attached kelp at 12 m depth. Turf-attached kelp allocated a greater proportion of biomass to the holdfast (anchoring structure), which differed morphologically from that of rock-attached kelp and had lower attachment strength. To assess how these differences affect survival, we monitored kelp in 2 m diameter plots at 11 m depth over 40 wk at 1 site. Smaller kelps were predominantly turf-attached and larger ones rock-attached in late summer and autumn, but there was near-complete loss of both turf- and rock-attached kelp over winter when wave action was greatest. In a concurrent manipulative experiment at 5 m depth at another site, we transplanted small boulders with turf- or rock-attached kelp to a wave-exposed or protected location. Survival was greater for rock-attached transplants at both locations after 12 wk, with a complete loss of turf-attached kelp in the wave-exposed treatment. Classification based on holdfast morphology showed that 76% of drift kelp within a depositional area at this site was once turf-attached. Low survival of kelps that recruit to turf algae, likely due to wave dislodgement, may represent an important feedback that increases resilience of a turf-dominated state and prevents reestablishment of kelp. KEY WORDS: Kelp · Turf-forming algae · Holdfast · Attachment strength · Recruitment · Feedback Full text in pdf format Information about this Feature Article Supplementary material NextCite this article as: Burek KE, O’Brien JM, Scheibling RE (2018) Wasted effort: recruitment and persistence of kelp on algal turf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 600:3-19. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12677 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 600. Online publication date: July 30, 2018 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2018 Inter-Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207