MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2811107629 · doi:10.1002/cpns.49

Assessing Individual Neuronal Activity Across the Intact Brain: Using Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR) to Detect<i>Arc</i>mRNA Localized to the Nucleus in Volumes of Cleared Brain Tissue

2018· article· en· W2811107629 on OpenAlexafffund
Emily Kramer, Patrick E. Steadman, Jonathan R. Epp, Paul W. Frankland, Sheena A. Josselyn

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols in Neuroscience · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsClearanceArc (geometry)NucleusMessenger RNAIn situ hybridizationBiologyNeurosciencePathologyChemistryMedicineGeneBiochemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arc (activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein) is an immediate early gene that may be used to label recently active neurons. Arc is transcribed following neuronal activity, and its mRNA is then rapidly transported to dendrites. This feature allows nuclear-localized Arc mRNA to define ensembles of recently active neurons in systems or circuit neuroscience. However, typical in situ hybridization techniques severely constrain the thickness of the tissue specimen (typically 20-µm brain slices). Here, we describe a protocol for visualizing intranuclear Arc mRNA in large (4 × 4 × 3 mm) volumes of intact mouse brain tissue. We combined a tissue clearing protocol (iDISCO+) with an advanced in situ hybridization technique (hybridization chain reaction [HCR]) to detect nuclear-localized Arc mRNA in whole, intact brain regions without the need for brain sectioning or reconstruction. We successfully applied this protocol to image ensembles of neurons of the basolateral amygdala in mice that are active following the recall of a conditioned fear memory. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Protocols in NeuroscienceSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207