MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Early Phase I Results for 4-Demethyl-4-cholesteryloxypenclo-medine [DM-CHOC-PEN] as Therapy in Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Subjects with Advanced Malignancies

2018· article· en· W2811170565 on OpenAlex
Lee Roy Morgan, Roy S. Weiner, Marcus Ware, Manish Bhandari, T Mahmood, Philip Friedlander

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of cancer research updates · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectInternal medicineClinical trialPharmacokineticsOncologyGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4-Demethyl-4-cholesteryloxycarbonylpenclomedine (DM-CHOC-PEN) is a poly-chlorinated pyridine carbonate with a MOA via bis-alkylation of DNA @ N7-guanine and N4-cytosine that has completed adult clinical Phase I and II trials in individuals with malignancies involving the CNS. We report here objective clinical observations seen in a clinical Phase I DM-CHOC-PEN trial with AYA subjects that have cancer (some of which had CNS involvement). Subjects & Methods: DM-CHOC-PEN was administered as a single 3-hr IV infusion once every 21 days in escalating doses from 50 - 98.7 mg/m2 to individuals (aged 15-39 years of age) with advanced malignancies. Results: Twelve (12) AYA individuals have been treated to date (with or without CNS involvement). The drug was well tolerated with fatigue (17%) being the most common adverse effect. No neuro/cognitive, liver dysfunction, hematological, cardiac, renal or GI toxicities were observed. Pharmacokinetic profiling revealed higher AUCs for all dose levels (50-98.7 mg/m2) than had been seen previously in adults. Three (3) AYA individuals treated (1 each with NSCLC, ALL, and astrocytoma involving the CNS) have responded with CR/PR (RECIST 1.1), improved QOL/PFS (Kaplan-Meier) and OS from 8 to 35+ mos. Conclusion: DM-CHOC-PEN is safe in doses of 50-98.7 mg/m2 and produced objective responses with improved OS and manageable toxicities in AYA individuals with malignancies involving the CNS. Complete data on subject responses and observed toxicities will be presented. The data support a 3-stage mechanism for tumor cytotoxicity: entry into the CNS and into the tumor via reversible binding to RBC membranes; then transported into cancer cells with L-glutamine; and bis-alkylation as described above.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it