Preadolescent Phthalate (DEHP) Exposure Is Associated With Elevated Locomotor Activity and Reward-Related Behavior and a Reduced Number of Tyrosine Hydroxylase Positive Neurons in Post-Adolescent Male and Female Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phthalate administration to male rats has been shown to negatively impact neural development while development of the female rat brain is less affected. Because a number of exogenous agents have been shown to interfere with dopamine function, we evaluated post-adolescent behavioral (operant conditioning for food reward and locomotor activity), histological (tyrosine hydroxylase; TH), and genetic (mRNA levels) outcomes of preadolescent (postnatal days [PND] 16-22) phthalate exposure. Male and female Long-Evans rats were administered 4 doses (0, 1, 10, or 20 mg/kg) of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) i.p. from PND16 to 22. Rats were trained on an operant task to bar press for chocolate-flavored pellets from PND55-63 then euthanized on PND78. The 10 mg/kg DEHP dose was associated with elevated bar pressing for food reward during acquisition and extinction while the 20 mg/kg dose was associated with elevated locomotor activity in both males and females. Stereological analysis revealed reduced TH+ densities in the SNc in DEHP- (10 and 20 mg/kg) treated male and female rats. In the VTA, TH+ staining was reduced in male rats treated with 10 or 20 mg/kg DEHP while in females, the TH: CV ratio was higher at the 10 mg/kg dose compared with controls. An examination of Th mRNA showed a main effect of sex with females showing increased Th expression at all DEHP doses. The present results show that preadolescent phthalate exposure results in detrimental dopaminergic system development impacting neurobehavioral function in post-adolescent rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".