MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2831862991 · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.002

A comparison of the effects of selective and non-selective mineralocorticoid antagonism on glucose homeostasis of heart failure patients with glucose intolerance or type II diabetes: A randomized controlled double-blind trial

2018· letter· en· W2831862991 on OpenAlexafffund
Sandra Korol, Michel White, Eileen O’Meara, François Tournoux, Normand Racine, Anique Ducharme, Jean‐Lucien Rouleau, Mark Liszkowski, Asmaa Mansour, Martin Jutras, Marie‐Claude Guertin, Mathieu Bernier, Joël Lavoie, Grégoire Leclair, Paul‐Eduard Neagoe, Diana Chaar, Martin G. Sirois, Simon de Denus

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Heart Journal · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
FundersBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaNovartisARCA BiopharmaRocheBayerAstraZenecaAstraZeneca CanadaServierPfizerFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéPfizer CanadaAbbott Laboratories
KeywordsSpironolactoneMedicineEplerenoneMineralocorticoid receptorGlucose homeostasisHeart failureInternal medicineMineralocorticoidType 2 diabetesRandomized controlled trialEndocrinologyImpaired glucose toleranceDiabetes mellitusHomeostasisAldosteroneBlood sugar regulationCardiologyInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Heart JournalSame topicHormonal Regulation and HypertensionFrench-language works237,207