A Prospective Trial of Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Reveals Significant Disease Response and No Association with Frequency of Regulatory T Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an accepted treatment for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD); however, the mechanism of action is unclear. We conducted a prospective multicenter clinical trial to assess ECP response rates using the 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria and to assess the relationship between regulatory T cells (Tregs) and treatment response (NCT01324908). Eighty-three patients with any NIH subtype of cGVHD were enrolled, irrespective of number of prior lines of treatment, and 6 were subsequently excluded because of the absence of follow-up from cancer relapse, infection, or study withdrawal. Study outcomes were provider-assessed response and formal response by 2005 NIH criteria. Peripheral blood samples were collected at prespecified study visits and were analyzed by flow cytometry for Tregs. In a heavily pretreated cohort of patients, with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy, 62.3% of patients had a provider-assessed response to ECP and 43.5% had response by NIH criteria. These assessments showed only a slight agreement (kappa statistic, .09). In a logistic regression model that included previously identified risk factors such as bilirubin, platelet count, and time from transplant to study entry, no clinical factors were associated with the provider's response assessment. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in percentage of Tregs in blood leukocytes at study entry and completion or in overall change in Treg frequency between ECP responders and nonresponders. ECP was associated with a clinically significant decrease in median prednisone dose (.36 to .14 mg/kg, P < .001) from study entry to last visit and a significant decrease in global severity of cGVHD and total body surface area with erythematous rash. Overall, ECP was able to deliver response using NIH response criteria in a highly pretreated cohort with moderate and severe cGVHD independent of most previous risk factors for adverse outcomes of cGVHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".