MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2850515277 · doi:10.1111/cea.13220

Population pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous C1‐inhibitor for prevention of attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema

2018· article· en· W2850515277 on OpenAlexaff
Dipti Pawaskar, Michael A. Tortorici, Bruce L. Zuraw, Timothy Craig, Marco Cicardi, Hilary Longhurst, H. Henry Li, William R. Lumry, Inmaculada Martinez‐Saguer, Joshua Jacobs, Jonathan A. Bernstein, Marc A. Riedl, Constance H. Katelaris, Paul K. Keith, Annette Feussner, Jagdev Sidhu

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Experimental Allergy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersBioCrystCSL Behring
KeywordsPharmacokineticsMedicineNONMEMHereditary angioedemaBioavailabilityPharmacologyPopulationDosingVolume of distributionImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Background Long‐term prophylaxis with subcutaneous (SC) administration of a highly concentrated plasma‐derived C1‐esterase inhibitor (C1‐INH) formulation was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for hereditary angioedema (HAE) attack prevention. Objective To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of C1‐INH (SC) (HAEGARDA ® ; CSL Behring) in healthy volunteers and HAE patients, and assess the variability and influence of covariates on pharmacokinetics. Methods C1‐INH functional activity data obtained after administration of various C1‐INH (intravenous; IV) and C1‐INH (SC) doses from 1 study in healthy volunteers (n = 16) and 2 studies in subjects with HAE (n = 108) were pooled to develop a population pharmacokinetic model (NONMEM v7.2). Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from steady‐state simulations based on the final model were also evaluated. Results C1‐INH functional activity following C1‐INH (SC) administration was described by a linear one‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and elimination, with inter‐individual variability in all parameters tested. The mean population bioavailability of C1‐INH (SC), and pharmacokinetic parameters for clearance (CL), volume of distribution, and absorption rate were estimated to be ~43%, 1.03 mL/hour/kg, 0.05 L/kg and 0.0146 hour −1 , respectively. The effect of bodyweight on CL of C1‐INH functional activity was included in the final model, estimated to be 0.74. Steady‐state simulations of C1‐INH functional activity vs time profiles in 1000 virtual HAE patients revealed higher minimum functional activity ( C trough ) levels after twice‐weekly dosing with 40 IU/kg (~40%) and 60 IU/kg (~48%) compared with 1000 IU IV (~30%). Based on the population pharmacokinetic model, the median time to peak concentration was ~59 hours and the median apparent plasma half‐life was ~69 hours. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance Twice‐weekly bodyweight‐adjusted dosing of C1‐INH (SC) exhibits linear pharmacokinetics and dose‐dependent increases in C trough levels at each dosing interval. In this analysis, SC dosing led to maintenance of higher C trough levels than IV dosing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.608

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical & Experimental AllergySame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207