MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2873519758 · doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.8b00145

Continuous Flow Process for Reductive Deoxygenation of ω-Chloroketone in the Synthesis of Vilazodone

2018· article· en· W2873519758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic Process Research & Development · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsApotex Pharmachem (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeoxygenationYield (engineering)Sodium borohydrideContinuous stirred-tank reactorChemistryBoraneIndole testContinuous flowProcess (computing)Flow chemistryProcess engineeringChemical engineeringCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisMaterials scienceComputer scienceMetallurgyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A continuous flow process for the reductive deoxygenation of 3-(4-chlorobutanoyl)-1H-indole-5-carbonitrile to 3-(4-chlorobutyl)-1H-indole-5-carbonitrile was developed using a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) setup. The opportunity for process optimization as well as scale-up feasibility was investigated at a laboratory scale. Advantages of a continuous process such as increased product yield, minimized impurity formation, enhanced safety, and increased overall purity of the isolated material thereby avoiding a purification step were demonstrated. Both sodium borohydride and a borane·THF complex were explored as reducing agents in conjunction with iron trichloride which produced high purity 3-(4-chlorobutyl)-1H-indole-5-carbonitrile not requiring further purification in higher yield than the standard batch process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it