Abstract 2991: Cytoplasmic mislocalization of CTCF by NPM1c in acute myeloid leukemia resulting in inhibited CTCF regulatory functions generating aberrant genetic and epigenetic profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract AML is not a single disease but rather a collection of diseases caused by a variety of mutations. About 30% of AML cases are characterized by a TCTG insertion in the exon 12 of Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1). Due to this mutation, mutant NPM1 (NPM1c) is mislocalized and maintained predominantly in the cytoplasm of the cell. Previously it had been reported that NPM1 binds to CCCTC binding factor (CTCF). Based on this observation we hypothesized that NPM1c would mislocalize CTCF into the cytoplasm, preventing CTCF's access to binding sites in the nucleus, and allowing for epigenetic misregulation of gene expression. To demonstrate that NPM1c could mislocalize CTCF to the cytoplasm we used confocal microscopy. While CTCF was completely nuclear in cells expressing NPM1, CTCF was present in the nucleus and the cytoplasm of cells expressing NPM1c. The cytoplasmic interaction of NPM1c and CTCF was confirmed by immunoprecipitation and western blotting. Using fluorescently tagged sub-fragments of NPM1c and CTCF we found that a.a. 1-264 of CTCF interacted with a.a. 244-298 of NPM1c. CTCF has multiple effects on gene expression related to the level of CTCF in the cell/nucleus; overexpression of CTCF leads to cell senescence while reduced expression can lead to immortalization. Such effects are likely mediated by the effects of CTCF on gene expression and alternate splicing. Increased expression of HOXA9 is a characteristic of NPM1c AML and has been shown to be affected by CTCF binding between HOXA9 and HOXA7 in IMR90 cells. To determine if NPM1c would affect HOXA9 expression in IMR90 cells, we infected the cells with NPM1c or NPM1. Similar to CTCF knockdown in IMR90 cells, there was increased expression of HOXA9 in the NPM1c, but not NPM1 modified cells. Moreover, the IMR90 cells expressing NPM1c became immortal. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation we found that there was reduced binding of CTCF to the CTCF binding site 2kb downstream of HOXA9 in the IMR90 cells expressing NPM1c. Reduced CTCF binding to this site was observed in the NPM1c mutant human cell line OCI-AML-3 but not NB4 cells, an AML cell line, that lacks the mutation. Loss of CTCF binding in NPM1c expressing cells was further demonstrated by changes in CTCF mediated alternate splicing and enhancer blocking activity using reporter assays. Finally, interrogation of the TCGA AML data set showed increased methylation of CTCF binding sites in NPM1c AML. This is in keeping with de novo methylation that occurs when CTCF no longer binds to its cognate site. Based on these studies we propose that the transforming effect of NPM1c is due, in large part, to its ability to mislocalize CTCF and suggests that targeting the interaction between these two proteins could be of potential therapeutic benefit. Citation Format: Atom Wang, Youqi Han, Peikun Chen, Nanyang Jia, Mark D. Minden. Cytoplasmic mislocalization of CTCF by NPM1c in acute myeloid leukemia resulting in inhibited CTCF regulatory functions generating aberrant genetic and epigenetic profiles [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2991.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".