MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887576581 · doi:10.1038/s41431-018-0219-y

Registered access: authorizing data access

2018· article· en· W2887576581 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephanie O. M. Dyke, Mikael Lindén, Ilkka Lappalainen, Jordi Rambla, Knox Carey, David Lloyd, Dylan Spalding, Moran N. Cabili, Giselle Kerry, Julia Foreman, Tim Cutts, Mahsa Shabani, Laura Lyman Rodriguez, Maximilian Haeussler, Brian Walsh, Xiaoqian Jiang, Shuang Wang, Daniel Perrett, Tiffany Boughtwood, Andreas Matern, Anthony J. Brookes, Miro Cupak, Marc Fiume, Ravi Pandya, Ilia Tulchinsky, Serena Scollen, Juha Törnroos, Samir Das, Alan C. Evans, Bradley Malin, Stephan Beck, Steven E. Brenner, Tommi Nyrönen, Niklas Blomberg, Helen V. Firth, Matthew E. Hurles, Anthony Philippakis, Gunnar Rätsch, Michael Brudno, Kym M. Boycott, Heidi L. Rehm, Michael Baudis, Stephen T. Sherry, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Dixie B. Baker, Paul Flicek

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Human Genetics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaHospital for Sick ChildrenMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversity of TorontoOntario GenomicsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMcGill UniversityMcGill Genome Centre
FundersSpace Operations Mission DirectorateCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeVlaamse regeringUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Institutes of HealthGovernment of CanadaNational Human Genome Research InstituteWellcome TrustEuropean Molecular Biology LaboratoryNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchGenome CanadaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilGenomic Health
KeywordsData accessData sharingAccess managementReuseHealth careAllianceComputer scienceBusinessKnowledge managementDatabaseMedicinePolitical scienceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) proposes a data access policy model-"registered access"-to increase and improve access to data requiring an agreement to basic terms and conditions, such as the use of DNA sequence and health data in research. A registered access policy would enable a range of categories of users to gain access, starting with researchers and clinical care professionals. It would also facilitate general use and reuse of data but within the bounds of consent restrictions and other ethical obligations. In piloting registered access with the Scientific Demonstration data sharing projects of GA4GH, we provide additional ethics, policy and technical guidance to facilitate the implementation of this access model in an international setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.856
GPT teacher head0.651
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207