A Quadrupole‐Central‐Transition <sup>59</sup>Co NMR Study of Cobalamins in Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We report the first observation of quadrupole‐central‐transition (QCT) 59 Co ( I =7/2) NMR signals from three cobalamin (Cbl) compounds (CNCbl, MeCbl, and AdoCbl) dissolved in glycerol/water. Measurements were performed at four magnetic fields ranging from 11.7 to 21.1 T. We found that the 59 Co QCT signals observed for cobalamin compounds in the slow motion regime (ω 0 τ C ≫1) are significantly narrower than those observed from their aqueous solutions where the molecular tumbling is near the condition of ω 0 τ C ≈1. We demonstrated that an analysis of 59 Co QCT signals recorded over different temperatures and at multiple magnetic fields allowed determination of both the 59 Co quadrupole coupling constant and chemical shift anisotropy for each of the three cobalamins. We successfully applied the 59 Co QCT NMR approach to monitor in situ the transformation of CNCbl to its “base off” form in the presence of KCN. We further discovered that, to obtain the maximum QCT signal intensity with the Hahn‐echo sequence, a strong B 1 field should be used for the first 90° pulse, but a weak B 1 field for the second 180° pulse. The reported 59 Co QCT NMR methodology opens up a new direction for studying structure and function of cobalamin compounds and their roles in biological processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".