MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2889012164 · doi:10.1101/405415

Clonotypic Heterogeneity In Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Revealed By Comprehensive Whole Exome/Transcriptome Sequencing

2018· preprint· en· W2889012164 on OpenAlexafffund
Aishwarya Iyer, Jordan Patterson, Thomas G. Salopek, Gane Ka‐Shu Wong, Robert Gniadecki

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersBispebjerg HospitalUniversity of AlbertaCanadian Dermatology Foundation
KeywordsT-cell receptorMycosis fungoidesBiologyTranscriptomeLymphomaRepertoireExome sequencingGene rearrangementT cellExomePeripheral T-cell lymphomaImmunologyGeneGeneticsMutationImmune systemGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, is believed to represent a clonal expansion of a transformed skin resident memory T-cell. T-cell receptor (TCR) clonality (i.e. identical sequences of rearranged TCRα, β and γ), the key premise of this hypothesis, has been difficult to document conclusively because malignant cells are not readily distinguishable from the tumor infiltrating, reactive lymphocytes, which contribute to the TCR clonotypic repertoire of MF. Here we have successfully adopted the technique of targeted whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing (WES/WTS) to identify the repertoire of rearranged TCR genes in tumor enriched samples from patients with MF. Although most of the investigated biopsies of MF had the expected monoclonal rearrangements of TCRγ of the frequency corresponding to the frequency of tumor cells, in half of the samples we detected multiple (up to seven) TCRα and -β clonotypes by WES and WTS. Our findings are compatible with the model in which the initial malignant transformation in MF does not occur in mature, memory T-cells but rather at the level of T-lymphocyte progenitor after TCRγ rearrangement but before TCRβ or TCRα rearrangements. The WES/WTS method is potentially applicable to other types of T-cell lymphomas and enables comprehensive characterization of the TCR repertoire and mutational landscape in these malignancies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchFrench-language works237,207