Organization of the multigene families of African Swine Fever Virus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
African swine fever virus is a complex DNA virus that infects swine and is spread by ticks. Mortality rates in domestic pigs are very high and the virus is a significant threat to pork farming. The genomes of 16 viruses have been sequenced completely, but these represent only a few of the 23 genotypes. The viral genome is unusual in that it contains 5 multigene families, each of which contain 3-19 duplicated copies (paralogs). There is significant sequence divergence between the paralogs in a single virus and between the orthologs in the different viral genomes. This, together with the fact that in most of the multigene families there are numerous gene indels that create truncations and fusions, makes annotation of these regions very difficult; it has led to inconsistent annotation of the 16 viral genomes. In this project, we have created multiple sequence alignments for each of the multigene families and have produced gene maps to help researchers more easily understand the organization of the multigene families among the different viruses. These gene maps will help researchers ascertain which members of the multigene families are present in each of the viruses. This is critical because some of the multigene families are known to be associated with virus virulence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".