MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Post hoc analysis of a phase III study to test the association between circulating <i>methylated glutathione s transferase (mGSTP1</i>) DNA levels and response to docetaxel (DTX) in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2017· article· en· W2890319629 on OpenAlexaff
Kate Mahon, Wenjia Qu, Hui‐Ming Lin, Calan Spielman, Daniel Cain, Cindy Jacobs, Kim N., Johann S. de Bono, Celestia S. Higano, Susan J. Clark, Lisa G. Horvath

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGSTP1DocetaxelInternal medicineProstate cancerPost-hoc analysisOncologyCancerGastroenterologyGlutathioneBiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5014 Background: GSTP1 inactivation is associated with CpG island hypermethylation in > 99% prostate cancers. Detection of circulating mGSTP1 DNA predicts response to DTX and overall survival (OS) in phase I/II mCRPC cohorts. This post hoc analysis of a phase III study aims to test the association between circulating mGSTP1 DNA levels and outcomes. Methods: The phase III SYNERGY study tested DTX +/- custirsen as 1st line chemotherapy in mCRPC (n = 1022) with no OS benefit in the experimental arm. Serum samples were taken at baseline (BL) and preC3 of DTX +/- custirsen from 600 patients (pts) enrolled on the SYNERGY study. mGSTP1levels in free DNA were measured using a sensitive methylation specific PCR assay and correlated with PSA response, time to PSA progression (TTP) and OS. Results: On interim analysis of 300 pts, serum mGSTP1 was detectable at BL in 80% and preC3 in 44%. Undetectable preC3 mGSTP1 correlated with a ≥30% fall in PSA within 3m of starting DTX (p < 0.001). Detectable BL and preC3 mGSTP1 predicted shorter TTP after DTX (BL; HR 1.6 95%CI 1.1-2.3; p = 0.01 and preC3 HR 2.2 95%CI 1.6-2.9; p < 0.001). Detectable mGSTP1 at both time points predicted shorter OS (BL; median OS 18.4 vs 33.1m, HR 2.4 95%CI 1.6-3.7; p < 0.001 and preC3; median OS 13.9 vs 29m, HR 2.7 95%CI 2.0-3.6; p < 0.001). In those with detectable BL mGSTP1, 50% had undetectable preC3 mGSTP1 predicting > 30% fall in PSA within 3m (p < 0.001), improved TTP (HR 0.40 95%CI 0.29-0.57; p < 0.001) and improved OS (25.2 vs 13.9 m HR 0.38 95%CI 0.28-0.51; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis including Hb, Karnofsky PS, LDH, PSA and visceral metastases, detectable preC3 mGSTP1 independently predicted shorter TTP (HR 1.9 95%CI 1.4-2.6; p < 0.001). Detectable mGSTP1at both time points independently predicted OS (BL; HR1.8 95%CI 1.2-2.8; p = 0.006 and preC3; HR 2.2 95%CI 1.6-3.0; p < 0.001). Results from the full cohort of 600 pts will be available for presentation at the meeting. Conclusions: This study should validate circulating mGSTP1 DNA as a marker of therapeutic benefit and prognosis in men with mCRPC receiving DTX and could be utilized for clinical management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→